The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Thames Valley firm BP Collins has brought a case in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) that could have ;implications ;for lawyers wanting to work beyond ;the ;statutory retirement age.
Leslie Seldon, a former partner at South East firm Clarkson Wright & Jakes, is challenging the firm over its policy of enforcing a retirement age of 65. The appeal was heard by Mr Justice Elias, president of EAT, last week (14 July).
The original claim, heard in January, was rejected on the grounds that Clarkson Wright & Jakes had been justified in forcing Seldon’s retirement because it would create better career opportunities for other employees at the firm.
However, BP Collins partner Jo Davis, representing Seldon, warned that, if unsuccessful at appeal, UK discrimination laws could be at odds with European laws because of a separate case being brought in the European Courts of Justice. Davis instructed Richard O’Dair of 36 Bedford Row to act on behalf of Seldon.
Clarkson Wright & Jakes instructed Thomas Croxford of Blackstone Chambers.