Acumen+giving+you+the+edge

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.

Headline

Daily Mail chief slams judge

Comment

Just because he won't be able to sell as many papers if he can't as easily fill them with the sordid details of the lives of others. I think his stance is disgraceful and arrogant, effectively saying - "I should be able to spy on anyone's life and publish any detail I so choose in order to sell more papers, and anyone who stops me doing this is wrong." Taking the Maz Mosley case as an example, why does anyone have a right to know about his session with a bevvy of dommes? It in no way affects me or the vast majority of the British public and we should have no right (or ideally even desire) to know about such goings on, and I can think of no good reason why we should effectively be allowed to spy on the private lives of others in cases like these.

Posted date

10-Nov-2008

Posted time

3:24 pm

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Most popular

Most commented

Most emailed