Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.

Headline

Cooke Young & Keidan wins right to take Barclays Libor claims to High Court

Comment

How could the claimant possibly have ustained a loss of £38m due to the alleged 'manipulation' of libor? I can understand a more general swaps mis-selling issue, but LIBOR 'manipulation'? Seems that Flaux has little or no understanding of LIBOR, how it was set, the market conditions at the tim etc. What a total waste of court time and taxpayer's money.

Posted date

1-Nov-2012

Posted time

11:50 am

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory