Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.

Headline

TwitterJokeTrial and the relationship of criminal law to social media

Comment

@Anonymous - He should have had a jury. I jury would have laughed it out of court. I'm entirely convinced. @(Philip Gibbons) - You are correct about the public interest considerations and that the courts have no jurisdiction over CPS decisions. The public interest stage is taken after the evidential stage though (or it is meant to be. I have my doubts in this case). The CPS have argued this time that Article 10 should be seen as having the effect of informing their public interest stage, rather than heightening the thresholds for evidence. I cannot accept this. Recent cases have shown that the CPS do not take free speech issues seriously. Also they are above scrutiny due to a qualified FOI exemption for "criminal investigations which the authority has the power to conduct."

Posted date

2-Jul-2012

Posted time

4:00 pm

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory