Report this comment to a moderator

EAT rules in favour of stripper in Stringfellows dispute

IMVHO, the issue cannot be whether there was , or was not a Contract in place. I used to employ entertainers and they always had a contract FOR SERVICES, This stipulated the days of performances, the agreed fees and contained "Time and Distance" bars precluding them from other appearan ces in the Town at the same time. I determined when they would "go on" but they determined the nature and content of their Act. They were self Employed. This case surely turns on the degree of control, rendering it arguably a Contract of Service" rather than a Contract for Services.

28-Apr-2012

11:19 am