Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.

Headline

Supreme Court rejects Seldon age discrimination case

Comment

Anonymous 1 makes some very cogent points. Please excuse any ignorance in this question, but can anyone here advise - is there no chance in such a situation of some kind of exceptional application to the Solicitors' Indemnity Fund? Also, I would have thought that the overriding objective would have been applied by the judges in the costs assessment? I will, of course, also do some research on these issues! Thanks.

Posted date

25-Apr-2012

Posted time

5:52 pm

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory