Report this comment to a moderator

Burges Salmon emphasises agriculture strength after Wilsons faux pas

Surely it is a conflict of interest for them to be involved in this type of agriculture when they have a clear interest in the cows, pigs, sheep etc main competitor, namely fish and obviously more specifically, the Salmon. Salmon (and things like tuna) are much better to eat I recon so I would argue that they should continue to focus in this area. Also, when producing fish, you don’t need a commodity like potash as a capital expenditure in respect of the farm animals profitability – all you need is water and you can get that out of a tap or from the sky. Also, I think cows should be banned because I heard they are bad for the environment – worse than owning a car apparently. Pigs are offensive to certain religions so it is not a good idea to focus in that area. The market in chicken has already been cornered by KFC so there is no point looking at that area, especially since I guess KFC would instruct a US firm because they are American. But fish, whoever got offended by a fish? Exactly, no one. The only controversial thing that Burges Salmon need to worry about with the fish is the one I had the other day – namely a dolphin burger – but in all fairness, I don’t know what the fuss is about – I loved it – it tasted better than a panda pie anyway.

6-Apr-2011

12:49 pm