Report this comment to a moderator

Tugendhat J slams Solicitors from Hell creator for 'abusing court process'

Surely the point here is that the comment on the website was not made by a person who had been or was a client of the law firm, so any comments made by him were never going to be based on all the facts and circumstances (hearsay is probably what most of it was) Secondly the defence that ths defendant had a “moral and/or social duty to inform others of the wrongdoing or negligence of some solicitors" is (as others above have commented) completely undermined by the option to pay a fee to have negative comments removed from the website. I agree service such as the defendant claims to be providing would be a useful and beneficial tool for theose members of the public looking to choose a firm to represent them. However, it appears that the Defendant was not as interested in this public service as he was in making a few quid.

10-Apr-2011

7:47 pm