Report this comment to a moderator

Camerons, DLA square up to Bulgarian court

The above seems to be a rather simplistic representation of the case. I didn't see a single word on what the actual subject of the dispute is. "Protectionist stance" and the quotes from the representatives of the international firms are more of one-sided qualifications than a summary of the facts, which are totally missing from the article. I am not trying to suggest who is wrong or who is right, I am just saying that the readers should be respected enough to be allowed to make their own judgements based on true representation of the facts and the standpoints of both sides.

21-Jul-2009

10:11 am