Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.

Headline

Pre-nuptials could become binding after Shackleton loses appeal

Comment

This was inevitable and this is only the start of accepting Pre-nups. But the issue is why now of all times, certainly not the EU, but due to inherent sexual discrimination against men. Historically about 20 years ago , males exclusively worked and earned money and any pre-nup was created by the male ina stronger position. Now about in the last 15 years females have been in the workforce and some have made fortunes. The reason why UK did not look at pre-nups was due to unequal status but generally to protect females rights. Now more males are suing for funds accrued during marriage , the situation is now being reassesed. If one looks back , it will show that if males earned money then pre-nups were ignored, but a female is now being sued , ?????

Posted date

3-Jul-2009

Posted time

5:22 pm

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory