The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Herbert Smith Freehills’ controversial rebrand was done in just four months
You never get anything done in the legal market without encountering a bit of sniping and Herbert Smith Freehills’ rebrand is no exception. Some say they can’t look at the firm’s new logo without thinking of grim reality show Big Brother.
But the team behind the firm’s new image insists that Herbert Smith Freehills now has something few other law firms can lay claim to - a brand that means something.
“It’s hard to say something different in the legal market because you have a lot of similar firms out there,” says Jason Frank, managing director at design and communications agency SAS, which handled the rebrand. “It came down to Herbert Smith Freehills being smart people who were working on high-value projects and getting their clients through ever more risky global economies. They are proactive and cut to the heart of a matter. It was important that this came through in the visual element of the brand, so the logo is informed by that organ of human perception - the eye.”
Parker and Frank would not comment on how much the project cost Herbert Smith Freehills, or how much they usually charge for similar work, save to say that it was not a seven-figure sum.
Normally, the company would have a year to do a rebrand - including a website and graduate recruitment material, but in this case they had just four months to get the bulk of the work done and approved.
Given the timescale law firm management usually operates on, that’s nothing to be sniped at.