QualitySolicitors to put desks in 500 WHSmith branches

  • Print
  • Comments (32)

Readers' comments (32)

  • Not sure about all the firms on that list but I know of at least two that should be using the banned "Inexperience, Unsupervised, Untrained Paralegals" rather than claiming solicitors will be anywhere near the cases.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Give it 10 years and there wlll be four or five national firms which dominate the market nationwide.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So they were in talks with four top 100 firms in October 2010, but six months on nothing has been agreed...
    Did they mean top 100 stationery firms?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • People said that it would be the end of the banks, when Sainsbury et al moved into the market.
    There will always be a market for the solicitors, but how quality solicitors thinks that by 'cuddeling up' to WH Smith is going to bring anything more than a trumped-up secretary giving advice behind the desk in the shop; that she's read on the flyers the week she started.
    Quality this is not the path you should be going down.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I remember the dim and distant days when we in the FS world would have stands in garden centres and at agricultural shows and solicitors would walk past and look down on us.
    It is an OK way of getting ad hoc, low to modest value transactional business but itis a pretty down market and soul destroying way to work.
    Hey Ho, needs as must I suppose!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "It is an OK way of getting ad hoc, low to modest value transactional business ..."
    If only! No client one would want to have is going to be recruited via W H Smith.
    For a start, the decent middle class type of client would be too embarrassed at the possibility of being seen in public taking `legal' advice, fearing that a neighbour would see them and asume they were discussing divorce proceedings.
    No, the only type of client likely to be obtained is either the loony, with the carrier bag full of evidence that the government is spying on them through their TV or the client that in more generous times would have been eligible for legal aid, but can no way afford private client fees.
    In any case, any firm that needs to use the word `Quality' is almost by definition crap. It's like a car salesman calling himself `Honest Harry' - if you need to say you're honest it's because you aren't.
    Oh, and what hapened to those `several top 100 firms' that were due to sign up?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Apparently they are going to be there on saturdays too. It will be like when you come out of B&Q trying to sell you a conservatory you don't want so you rush out mumbling "no thanks"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It maybe more appropriate for them to teamup with a company such as specsavers.Although the y will need to have the desk near the entrance to get the clients on the way in rather than on the way out !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Will the Quality Lawyers also be trained to offer their clients a totally random chocolate bar or 6 packs of chewing gum for a £?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What happens when a franchise has already opened [Moorish - Bradford], and then WH Smith nearby puts it's desk in with advertising, flyers and the 'dolly bird' who once worked in a solicitors office as a cleaner ...
    I think there will be some pretty miffed partners in firms already operating as Quality, Craig Holt I think you will bring on a 'tsunami' of complaints from your original 'converts' which may well in future damage fatally your business plan ...which was good.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the above misses the point entirely - as I understand it, it will be Morrish in Bradford who staff the WHSmith desk and get the work generated.
    As for the other comments, I think the sneering about WHSmith misses the point entirely. It's about accessibility and brand recognition - the person there won't be delivering legal service they'll be helping to make appointments, hand out guides etc. I think QS are absolutely right that this will be a hugely significant change in the consumer retail legal market.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I bought this DVD last week and it doesn't work.
    Well Sir, you have a cast iron case and are entitled to a full refund.
    Excellent, would you mind accompanying me to the returns counter?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think this is going to be one of the biggest things to hit the legal industry in a long time. I recently had some time off from work and went down to a local market and there were solicitors on the streets touting for personal injury business - the real world is this, not the swish offices we all sit in each day.
    I think its easy to forget that in the real world most normal people don't think about quality, they think about cost and convenience. It is easy for the average person to pop down the road and get legal advice like a "drop in" clinic. Cheap, affordable, convenient, transparent about costs etc. - thats what people want these days.
    The legal market has never offerred something like this and one firm will quickly become dominant in this area and swallow up all the smaller firms. There is a gap in the market and these guys are exploiting it. It will be like a supermarket opening up next to a row of small grocery shops.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The snobbery shown by most of the comments above is breathtaking. OK the work that is likely to be picked up this way is not going to be headlining or glamorous but QS clearly think there will be sufficient work (in terms of fees) to justify trying something different.
    This is not for everyone, but no law firm can satisfy the requirements of all types of client.
    Change is coming to the legal profession and those of you who can't see this are going find themselves stacking the shelves at WHS!
    And no, I do not work for a firm in QS brand and have no intention of doing so.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This business model is not targetting your typical high level clients such as financial institutions. This is meant for the common man who usually lands up paying a bomb to a lawyer to get the most trivial of things done. If Quality gets large volumes of clients, they would have hit the jackpot! I personally wouldn't care if my neighbour saw me at one of these stores asking for legal advice or asking to be put in touch with one of Quality's lawyers - all I care about is getting sound legal advice at an affordable rate. Having said that, let's see how things pan out in the next 1 year. I hope they succeed!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I note the reference to Specsavers above. Therein lies a great example of what Quality Solicitors could achieve.

    Specsavers are the most successful opticians out there. Why? Because the brand and stores are everywhere, the eye tests and glasses are cheap and the service is quick and adequate. Smaller independent opticians may offer more caring, thoughtful eye care but the majority of the public don't give two hoots because independents' glasses and tests are more expensive.

    In an age of austerity coupled with a culture of wanting-and-often-getting-everything-for-next-to-nothing, QS will be a success, without question. They obviously won't touch the high-end commercial work of the top firms but work of will drafting, conveyancing, PI claims etc will inevitably be channelled to them at the expense of high street firms. If QS can cosy up with a few more multi-store brands like W H Smith thus expanding their exposure to the public further, they will become huge.

    I am sure there are a few snobby middle-class folk, who shop at Waitrose even though you can get the same grub far cheaper at Morrisons, who will turn their nose up at QS and pay higher legal fees to pseudo corporate-private client firms. However, to suggest that most folk will turn down cheap, easily accessible legal advice handed to them on a plate is totally short-sighted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have just completed a Doctoral thesis suggesting exactly this will happen and the impact of the changes on senior partners in law firms. The legal industry needs to wake up, become less arrogant and certainly less discriminatory and realise that in order to survive they have to come out and join the real commercial world rather than pontificating in their ivory towers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One thing is for sure the future of legal services delivery especially in the High Street is never going to be the same again. Whether the business model described will be definitive is moot but change on a major scale is here to stay. The profession may be uncomfortable with the notion that more than half of all legal services can be commoditised but it is inescapable. The real lproblems are unlikely to be in the High Street where the solcitor client relationship is adpatable and able to spedily meet market needs, The problem will occur when commercial clients come to realise that they too can benefit from similar interventions. It will make LPO to India look tame by comparison. Perhaps finally the price for services will be related to value and not open ended time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A copy of the News of the World and a libel writ from the ultimate one stop shop!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's interesting to see that a lot of negative comments about this idea are following a pattern of quite blatant sexism. Comments about 'dollybirds', 'secretaries' and 'cleaners who used to work in solicitors' offices' are all written in a feminine persona by the authors. The debate about whether these solicitors will be of as high a calibre as other firms is totally valid, but lets leave the sexism out of this debate, please?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (32)