The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
THE BAR and the Law Society say they want to see safeguards built in to any new statutory scheme governing disclosure of evidence in criminal cases.
Joining forces in response to Home Secretary Michael Howard's consultation paper on disclosure, the two representative bodies say the prosecution should be required to draw up a schedule of its evidence and provide it to the defence.
One of their proposals is for the police to identify all unused material on a form signed and dated by the investigator. The form would spell out the disclosure duties of the investigator and state that it is a criminal offence to provide false or misleading information.
Robert Roscoe, chair of the Law Society's criminal law committee, calls Howard's proposals "misguided".
He says the proposals "arise through police pressure and misconceptions held by the public" and claims the reforms will lead to miscarriages of justices.
James Goudie QC, chair of the Bar's law reform committee, says the prosecution should not be exposed to the temptation of not providing the defence with material which may prove the innocence of the defendant.
"We hope that our suggestion that prosecution and defence should define and clarify the issues in advance will reduce the time, effort and expense devoted to the question of disclosure, making trials more focused and efficient."