Categories:Australasia

Herbert Smith green lights October merger with Australia's Freehills

  • Print
  • Comments (39)

Readers' comments (39)

  • I don't know anything about the detailed terms of this "merger", but I have a sinking feeling that a lot of UK firms are going to get their fingers burned as a result of their push into the Australian market. I can see the advantages in terms of Herbert Smith's access to a source of well trained and relatively cheap lawyers, but what about the revenue side of the equation? What happens when exports of natural resources from Australia to China and elsewhere slow down and the Aussie dollar slides back towards its historical average against Sterling? I think this will end in tears for all concerned, and I'm not just talking about Herbert Smith / Freehills.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Herbert Smith managing partner David Willis declined to comment on the proposed remuneration structure and how profits would be split..." Look out Freehills partners. That means you're the new source of revenues to support Herbies' ever declining profitability.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There really are some pathetic people out there. Freehills clearly is a top tier firm. While hs may not be, who really is that big of a *&@! to come on here saying the magic circle firms are better? Do you work at any of the aforementioned? If you do, is it enjoyable spending most of your waking time at work?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Globalisation! Being "top tier" in Australia doesn't cut it any more. A fact that the partners at "top tier" Freehills must have realised if they were willing to marry frumpy old Herbert Smith and make Jonathon Scott the chair of the new Freebies firm.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One of the great things about working at a Magic Circle firm is that I know if I ever get tired of spending most of my waking time at work I can always get a job at one of the lesser firms like Herbert Smith where I can bill 2 hours a week and surf the web for another 30 hours a week, which is what most of my friends at Herbies do these days.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Either way it looks like the end for some departments e.g. Finance - get out while you can guys

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How do mergers create value? Operating synergies, such as improving resource allocation and cutbacks in expenditures. Get ready for the next redundency program.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very interesting - Herbies has been trying extremely hard to battle its own to move out of an archaic mindset that has been entrenched by underperformers at the top of the lockstep (ie the useless ones have the power and votes). Well done to the management for pulling them out of a slow and steady decline. Any misconception that they have been in the magic circle at any time in the last 10 years must have been blown out of all but the most stagnant waters by now. The firm had steadily been losing its grip on its litigation crown and has seen clients prefer the more commercially minded and service oriented firms and has seen high level departures. For HS at least, this has been a big step in the right direction after six months of constantly poor news. Fingers crossed they can make up the ground they've lost. Management shouldn't think they've succeeded yet though - the hard work's only beginning.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I do not work at either firm; I am very much a competitor. My assessement:

    quality + quality = quality

    Well done both on creating some competition for the Magic Circle.

    I expect that it will work out well.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This does nothing to move HS forwards. Its best partners will be seduced elsewhere to more profitable, better balanced firms. Trying to play international catch up is going to take too long and be too dilutive of PPP. The stars will not wait around in the hope...Be careful what you wish for Herbies.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • An emphasis on structure is the wrong approach for the two firms to take. It focuses on the firm and suggests that the priority is on partner profits and profit sharing, rather than on client service and the platform that you bring to the clients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mixed feelings about this "excitement" - some of those who took redundancy (due to the powers that be deciding less of us can do the same work) are still at the firm - bit insensitive to suddenly spring this on everyone - great timing, was it Willis' idea I wonder

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have worked with both Herbies and Freehills as a client. Both firms were average at best. The new Freebies firm poses no competition for the Magic Circle firms. If we use them at all - and that's a big IF - it will be for the commoditized work that a chimp sitting in front of a word processor could do.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I must congratulate the Herbert Smith PR people for popping up so quickly in the comments section to put a positive spin on the story before the great hordes of real people put in their more cynical view. I would just like to reassure them that they style of comments are exactly what we would normally expect to see on these pages and I can't imagine anyone will be able to tell which are real and which are puffery. So don't worry - it will work brilliantly and you will not look at all desperate or sad.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • That is a bloody good idea! Chimps in front of word processors. Why didn't I think of that myself?!? Just think of how many associates and support staff we could make redundent by replacing them with chimps in front of word processors. I'll get right on that - will call it Project Bananas!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Senior management has been pounding everyone over the head for months about the "merits" of this merger and partners were "strongly encouraged" to support the merger. Notwithstanding that the merger managed to pass the FIRST vote, many partners are highly skeptical. Let's see what happens at the next vote when the sacred lockstep partnership is up for sacrifice as part the true financial integration.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Isn't Herbert Smith the same firm that once referred to themselves as a "mini Slaughter and May"? The reality is they have been in decline for years. Who knows if the merger can pull them out of their long spiral downward. Probably not. Can't think of any truly great law firms who merged their way to greatness.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lots of firms have merged their way to greatness. Why there's ... uh .... well ... I'm sure there must be at least one. Maybe.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Freehills needs herbies much more than the other way around.
    Anyone with the slightest understanding of the profession can see that.
    Freehills has failed appallingly in every non-Aussie venture it has tried including the UK, Singapore, China, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand.
    In the past 2 years freehills has been left behind by the magic circle breaking ground in its australian backyard.
    Now every top partner and law student wants to join CC and A&O here.
    So what will herbies do, now that it is saddled with rubbish from downunder?
    Force Freehills partners to commit to international mobility? What a joke! Cite the Freehills track record of wasting time and money anywhere outside their country. Surely this international mobility "commitment" was oh-so-subtly written into the contract by freehills as a plan B excuse for its failing partners...
    Forget the hype - Herbies will have to do what it does best these days - sack and sack again...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (39)