The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
London law firm Warner Cranston represented the Paying Names Action Group (PNAG) which last week failed in the High Court to scupper a £3.2 billion rescue plan for the Lloyd's of London insurance market.
PNAG wanted the plan declared illegal on the grounds that it penalised those Names who continued to pay their debts during years when other investors were unable to meet their liabilities.
Warner Cranston senior associate John Abramson said the case was "always going to be very tight" and added that he was "obviously disappointed" with the result. "We were told by leading counsel that we had a case, otherwise we would be never have gone ahead."
Abramson said there were "extreme time pressures" in preparing for the hearing. Only a week separated the time when leave for judicial review was granted and when the actual case came to the High Court.
In his judgment, Lord Justice Brooke dismissed the application on the grounds that the court had no jurisdiction to interfere in the reconstruction and renewal plan.
He added that even if the court had jurisdiction, PNAG had delayed too long in bringing the application.
The judge dismissed the application on its merits, saying that Lloyd's had acted within its powers and had not acted perversely or irrationally.