The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
I refer to the letter of Charles Latham in answer to my article 'Loosening the straight jacket' (The Lawyer, 18 July 1995).
I am all in favour of improving European competition law. If this can be achieved without amending the EC Treaty, so much the better. But it is important there is no misunderstanding of the rules of this particular game. To my mind they are twofold. First, the jurisprudence which underlies the treaty is that of civil law. Second, Directorate IV has shown itself to be reluctant to give up its jurisdiction.
The question of jurisprudence raises another issue. Our common law system is evolving into a civil law system. Certainly this started in 1973 when the UK joined what is now the European Union. But the speed of this evolution is increasing. We have now the frequent use of the copy-out technique in the implementation of directives. In addition we have members of the judiciary who criticise parliamentary draughtsmen for seeking to interpret "defective" foreign laws (Beloit Technologies v Valmet Paper Machinery, The Times 12 May 1995).
In time we will have a better understanding of civil law jurisprudence. With this, it will be possible to make a more effective advance when advocating changes to the existing framework of European law.