Pinsents looks to strike out £10m professional negligence claim

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Readers' comments (2)

  • Surprised if this succeeded. The subcontractors who won in the TCC and Court of Appeal, setting up this claim, were either very lucky or very well represented to succeed with their argument that the pay when paid clause didnt work!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I dont know about that: the silk for Hare who won in front of the Judge and the Court of Appeal is known in the construction industry to be very good - but the silk on for Shepherd before the Judge and the CA was no slouch either - though Shepherd appears to have changed its team now. There looks to be something in the point. I wouldnt be so sure that the claim will fail!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (2)