A former Pinsent Masons trainee who left after an alleged assault by a colleague in 2011 is mulling bringing a civil action against his old firm.
Ross Knight, who began his traineeship at Pinsent Masons in August 2009, was on a night out with firm solicitor Edward Lowdell last year when Lowdell allegedly attacked him by putting him in a headlock and repeatedly punching him on the head. Both lawyers left Pinsent Masons later that year.
Knight’s solicitor, EMW consultant Trevor Jenkin, said that he was now considering the circumstances surrounding Knight’s departure. One possibility is that Knight could bring a civil action against his old firm.
Lowdell faces jail after pleading guilty to actual bodily harm at Blackfriars Crown Court on 1 August. He initially denied the charges against him and said he was acting in self defence, but yesterday changed his plea to guilty, according to the Daily Mail. Reports state that jurors were shown CCTV footage of the alleged attack. Lowdell will be sentenced tomorrow.
On the night of the attack, 25 March 2011, Lowdell and Knight were at an office party celebrating Pinsent Masons’ move to new headquarters in London’s Crown Place. The pair left the party with others at 11pm to carry on drinking at a pub.
After finishing at the pub, while walking through Hatton Garden, Lowdell put Knight into a headlock and punched him repeatedly. Police and ambulance services were called to the incident, which took place at around 1:40am, with Knight requiring hospital treatment for his injuries.
Pinsent Masons carried out an internal investigation of the incident, but Lowdell resigned from the firm before it was completed. Knight completed his training contract but left the firm in August 2011 and now works as a solicitor at a construction company. Lowdell has reportedly said that he intends to teach English abroad if he is spared jail.
In a statement, a spokesman for Pinsent Masons said that it was too early to comment on any possible civil action against the firm, but added: “Pinsent Masons prides itself on the professional conduct of its staff, and this was an isolated incident that occurred in March 2011. A thorough internal investigation into the matter was conducted at the time, and subsequently both staff members left the firm.”
Readers' comments (29)
Anonymous | 2-Aug-2012 3:42 pm
He won't win. Why should a firm be responsible for the behaviour of their staff after hours?
Pinsents were unwise to hire this aggressive boy, he already had a conviction for affray.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 2-Aug-2012 4:10 pm
"Pinsent Masons prides itself on the professional codnuct of its staff, and this was an isolated incident"
... I beg to differ, the stories one could tell.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Coolio | 2-Aug-2012 4:28 pm
Who dares, Wins.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 2-Aug-2012 5:15 pm
He seems to have forgotten about the first rule of fight club.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Victorian Dad - spare the rod, spoil the trainee | 2-Aug-2012 5:21 pm
Are you seriously suggesting that we are not allowed to flog our trainees? When did the law change?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
barrie cunning | 3-Aug-2012 1:38 am
There slogan is we have a can do attitude and get results...clearly it's kill or be killed..
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 3-Aug-2012 2:50 am
An employer can not be responsible for actions of employees particularly away from the office. Acts not in the course of employment and even if it was not foreseeable. Hopeless on merits
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
3-ducks | 3-Aug-2012 9:35 am
"Pinsents were unwise to hire this aggressive boy, he already had a conviction for affray."
Do you have any evidence to support this?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 3-Aug-2012 10:44 am
Employers have been held liable for sexual harassment at office parties, both on and off the premises.
Be interesting to see what the law behind the case against Pinsents would be, as and when it is presented.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 3-Aug-2012 10:51 am
Reference the conviction for affray, this has been widely reported in the national press.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment