Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
- Company/Commercial (109)
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (93)
- Corporate (73)
- Regulatory and compliance (66)
- Banking / Finance (54)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (46)
- Information Technology (41)
- Employment (40)
- Intellectual Property (40)
- Telecoms (36)
- Tax (29)
- Environment (27)
- Energy (25)
- Financial services (25)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (25)
- Funds (22)
- Insurance/reinsurance (19)
- Real Estate (19)
- Crime (16)
- Commodities (11)
- Construction (11)
- Healthcare (11)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (11)
- Insolvency & restructuring (9)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (9)
- Human Rights (7)
- Privacy and reputation (7)
- Pensions (6)
- Private Equity (6)
- Pharma/Biotech (5)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (5)
- Travel and Tourism (5)
- Personal tax / Trusts (4)
- Business Tax (3)
- Other (3)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (3)
- Family (2)
- In-House (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Private Client (2)
- Charities (1)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Competition/EU (1)
- Planning (1)
298 articles matched your search
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
Under the English Arbitration Act 1996, the grounds on which an English arbitration award can be challenged in court are very limited.
This issue of Perspectives focuses on recent ERISA fiduciary and tax decisions, which have special importance to plan sponsors and plan fiduciaries.
The Bribery Act 2010 has now been in force for three years. There have as yet been no corporate prosecutions brought under the act.
Scott E Barat has been appointed to serve as managing partner of Pillsbury’s Northern Virginia office, located in Tysons Corner.
In this podcast, Paul Harris shares his thoughts and observations on the commercial world, and intellectual property in particular.
California courts are clarifying potential liability under the CMIA of healthcare providers, health plans, pharmaceutical companies and others for the unauthorised disclosure of medical information.
The California Supreme Court in Iskanian v CLS Transportation Los Angeles held that its decision in Gentry v Superior Court is no longer good law.
Pillsbury has announced the appointment of 10 partners to firm-wide practice and industry leadership posts.
The next Quarterly Issues/Programs List must be placed in stations’ public inspection files by 10 July 2014.
The next Children’s Television Programming Report must be filed with the FCC and placed in stations’ public inspection files by 10 July 2014.
The importance of careful drafting was recently reiterated by the New York Court of Appeals in Quadrant Structured Products Co v Vertin.
FCC Enforcement Monitor: bad legal advice leads to admonishment for public file violations; and more
Pillsbury has released its FCC Enforcement Monitor for June 2014.
Proposed implementing legislation for the Mexican energy reform will create an open, competitive electrical power industry
The Mexican Congress is debating a historic package of legislation to restructure the nation’s electrical power sector.
The Ely Lily case highlighted the impact a judicial decision can have on a business. But what of the wider impact a judge can have on the economy as a whole?
A claimant seeking an injunction to prevent an alleged wrongful termination of a contract was entitled to argue that damages could not be an adequate remedy.
CERCLA imposes strict liability for the costs of environmental contamination on four classes of responsible parties, including current owners of contaminated properties.
The California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District has affirmed the Superior Court ruling in Ocean Avenue LLC v County of Los Angeles.
Plaintiffs in securities fraud class actions may satisfy the reliance element by showing that they traded on an ‘efficient market’ presumed to reflect all public material information.
FERC violated the National Environmental Policy Act by improperly ‘segmenting’ its NEPA analysis of a four-part upgrade to Tennessee Gas Pipeline’s 300 Line System.
Since the advent of ‘say-on-pay’, the plaintiffs’ securities bar has attempted to rustle up claims relating to executive compensation matters discussed in proxy statements.