The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
PERSONAL injury solicitors gearing up for conditional fees are confident they can strike up workable deals with barristers despite the continuing gulf between the Law Society and the Bar Council on terms of engagement.
The Law Society, which published its advice to solicitors last week, advises that the Bar's model terms of engagement are "in some respects disadvantageous to clients".
It says despite "long-running discussions", the two bodies have failed to agree on matters including whether counsel should advise on all cases before accepting instructions.
The Bar Council is considering the society's advice.
Michael Napier, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil), says the rift is "not a major dispute" but results from a need for both bodies to alert their members to the issues.
"I'm confident that once solicitors and barristers sit down and work together, this apparent divide will evaporate. Lawyers should be able to work something out."
Apil will monitor developments, and may develop its own protocol if problems continue to occur in practice, Napier says.
Pannone & Partners' head of PI litigation Frank Patterson, whose department has "dozens" of conditional fee cases lined up, says some barristers are already saying they will "do the whole thing on the basis of trust".