Peter Smith J case: the first test of judging the judges

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Readers' comments (1)

  • OJC Complaints upheld

    I am curious about the complaints that were upheld and who made them. Presumably, most of those that were upheld were made by those in the legal profession. I know ordinary litigants who have apparently been justified in making allegations against a judge's conduct in court but the reply is always that person notified cannot interfere in a legal matter and the conduct issue is ignored. I still have a video sent to me a few years ago about an investigation by someone in the media and how horrified he was that there was no record of how many times a judge had had his judgment appealled. He found one judge who had had a very large number of his judgments successfullly appealled.

    Judges are under enormous pressure to deal with cases quickly and unfortunately this means that self-litigants in particular are not given time to make their allegations in full and find themselves crossexamined before they have had a chance to give their evidence.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (1)