The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
In A highly unusual move, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has ordered the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to pay costs to intervener Visa Europe in the high-profile credit card fee arrangements probe.
The OFT has also been ordered to pay costs to the appellants Mastercard UK Members Forum (MMF), Mastercard International and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) after the CAT upheld their appeal on interchange fee arrangements.
One source close to the case said: "It's very unusal for an intevener to have its costs paid."
The total claimed by the appellants and Visa was just less than £5m, which represents more than 40 per cent of the OFT's enforcement budget. However, the tribunal awarded costs from the date the OFT filed its defence (31 March 2006). This represents the entire amount claimed by Visa.
The CAT set a September 2005 OFT decision aside after the regulator had made the unprecedented move of withdrawing its decision anyway. In its judgment, the tribunal slammed the OFT for its handling of the investigation.
The CAT judgment read: "In this present case, it is regrettable that, after some six years of proceedings, these appeals have to be terminated without result. In fact the OFT filed a defence on 28 February 2006, which in material part resiled from the case made in the decision - which is unfortunate.
"The change made in the defence affected some 250 paragraphs of the 750-paragraph decision, which is a considerable proportion by any reckoning."