Norton Rose is set to merge with US firm Fulbright & Jaworski, the firms have announced, with the deal going live on 1 June 2013.

Peter Martyr
The combined firm will be called Norton Rose Fulbright and, according to the UK firm, will join the top ten law firms globally by revenue and number of lawyers.
The firms’ combined revenues will come to roughly $1.9bn (£1.2bn), with Norton Rose turning over $1.32m in 2011-12, according to The Lawyer UK 200 2012, while Fulbright’s 2011 income was roughly $580m.
The confirmation follows one of the longest-running tie-up discussions in the legal market, with the UK and US duo understood to have been in talks for over a year.
It comes on the back of a Norton Rose partners’ conference in Toronto the weekend before last in which attendees voted on the combination, while Fulbright held its poll over the weekend just gone. Norton Rose CEO Peter Martyr is understood to have been in the US since the conference finalising the deal.
Some Norton Rose partners were not informed about the proposals until they arrived at the conference.
Martyr told The Lawyer today (14 November): “Certainly from our point of view and from Fulbright’s point of view it’s a spot-on marriage and it should really give us some brilliant opportunities in the future. One thing we really want to invest in which we think is a must for a global organisation is a regulatory practice. What we’re getting here is a top-class regulatory practice. In my view it will be a leader into a new chunk of business.”
Martyr is understood to have told board members a year and a half ago that the firm was not in talks with a US firm, with sources suggesting the serious discussions came after the firm sealed a merger with Canadian firm Macleod Dixon, its second deal in Canada (4 October 2011).
He today confirmed that the duo had been talking for around a year and at “full pace” for the last five or six months, adding: “We’ve been best friends for a long time and if you are best friends for this long things creep up slowly until you say maybe we should do something about this.”
He will be the global CEO of the combined business, while Fulbright chair-elect Ken Stewart will be managing partner of the US operations and will take a senior position on the overall global executive committee. Other Fulbright partners will also sit on the committee.
The new firm will be structured with a Swiss Verein over the top for accounting and tax reasons, in line with the firm’s other mergers in Australia and Canada, with the separate arms not sharing profits. The fiscal regime in the US would leave the firm with a large tax bill if the legacy firms became financially integrated.
Martyr said the firm had hired two of the Big Four accountancy firms to advise on the deal, adding: “I think we’ll watch and see what the accountants do [before deciding whether to merger financially]. Our behaviour is designed to the effect that we behave as a single business.”
The news comes after the firm went live with the Macleod Dixon tie-up on 1 January this year, following its first merger in Canada with Ogilvy Renault in 2011 (15 November 2010).
That happened at the same time as a combination with South African firm Deneys Reitz.
Martry said in a statement: “We have been looking at the US market for a number of years, seeking a firm that meets our requirements for excellence in law, good business synergies and a compatible culture. Fulbright & Jaworski meets all our criteria. It is financially strong, with forward-looking management and similar strategic growth aspirations.
“As Norton Rose Fulbright, we will continue to invest in our strongest practice areas and develop our expertise across our key industry sectors. We also expect to continue extending our global business not only in the US, but in the emerging growth markets of the future, in particular in Latin America, Africa and Asia.”
Stewart added: “This is a smart combination of two groups whose geographic presence, capabilities and client service cultures are strongly complementary. The combined organisation can provide the experience, insight and service our clients need everywhere they do business around the world.”
Readers' comments (22)
Anonymous | 14-Nov-2012 5:30 pm
He might want to check the speed dial of the GC of HSBC too....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 14-Nov-2012 7:04 pm
RTZ no longer exists - it was bought by CRA and became Rio Tinto in the 90's. Hopefully NR aren't still waiting for the GC of RTZ to call. I think the GC of HSBC might have a few other names on speed dial that he/she would use first for a deal. CC's comes to mind....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 14-Nov-2012 7:53 pm
Not to mention BHP Billiton, BNP Paibas etc.., etc..,
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 14-Nov-2012 8:30 pm
NR got that call from Rio and others and FJ is far from second tier energy
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 14-Nov-2012 9:45 pm
Ugh. Another frankenfirm, joining the ranks of:
-- Sonnenschein Nath Rosenthal Denton Wilde Sapte Salans Hertzfeld Heilbronn Fraser Milner Casgrain
-- Kirkpatrick Lockhart Nicholson Graham Preston Gates Ellis Bell Boyd Lloyd
-- Bingham Dana Gould McCutchen Doyle Brown Enerson Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman
-- Hogan Hartson Lovell White Durrant
-- Bryan Cave Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn Berman Powell Goldstein Frazer Murphy Holme Roberts Owen
-- Squire Sanders Hammonds
-- Pillsbury Madison Sutro Cushman Darby Cushman Winthrop Stimson Putnam Roberts Shaw Pittman Potts Trowbridge
-- DLA Piper Marbury Rudnick Wolf Gray Cary Ware Friendenrich
-- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale Dorr
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 14-Nov-2012 10:30 pm
"...with Norton Rose turning over $1.32m in 2011-12,". Heh
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 15-Nov-2012 2:08 am
And that of the GC of Barclays, RBS etc. If anything NR is big in FI.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 15-Nov-2012 10:13 am
The person saying F & J are second tier energy and NR does low value mining etc obviously just doesn't know anything about the market. Re GC HSBC - remind me, who did HSBC's rights issue in 2009?? Wasn't it NR? Was it not the biggest rights issue of all time? Who is selling HSBC's Asian assets?
Whose handling the major disposals for BP in Europe at the moment? Freshfields? No - NR.
Its probably already the best energy and mining firm in the world and with F & J it will just cement that.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 15-Nov-2012 11:28 am
Quite amusing seeing how second tier firms try to Big Themselves and love the Frankenfirm description. Very apt, although difficult to top Dentons for innapprooriate mixing of body parts.
No question NR are second tier in mining. |Despite claiming to act for Rio and BHP (neither company would allow a major advisor to work for the other), it's noticable that Rio use Links/Allens (or Herbies) for their major deals and BHP use S&M/Blakes (now Ashursts). So, despite have a few extra body parts, the quality of the verein members will not change and NRF will remain firmly in the second tier, even for mining.
Good luck to them, though, and hopefully this exclusive referal verein arrangement will increase their revenue line, even if it reduces (to 1) the number of US firms that will work with NR now.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 15-Nov-2012 3:05 pm
Frankenfirm - a description which you could also apply to many other major market players:
- Freshfields Deringer Tessin Herrmann Sedemund Bruckhaus Westrick Heller Löber
- Coward Chance Clifford Turner Pünder Volhard Weber Axster Roger Wells
- Linklaters Paines Rädler Raupach Oppenhoff & Rädler (though Oppenhoff later moved on again!)
it's a rare beast that has grown entirely through organic expansion.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment