Norton Rose faces hiring battle in wake of new Govt visa quota

  • Print
  • Comments (60)

Readers' comments (60)

  • I cannot help but notice the unfairness of the rules applying only to non EU skilled workers. Reminds me of Thatcher's objections to a boat full of Vietnamese refugees vis -a- vis Polish unskilled immigrants.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I forgot to mention I got accepted at Linklaters. May be Norton Rose should be called Norton Rose & Singh. It pays of course to be at Oxbridge :) Im proud to be at Links.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely Norton Rose could have found trainees from the resident labour market. Why were they applying for work permits for non EU nationals when there are so many law graduates looking for work?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If Mich[a]el Burbridge really is the name of the author of the comment above, then that's a nice own goal, although probably not particularly detrimental. Well played.

    It certainly isn't as bad as the guy who offered advice on the Legal Week career clinic a couple of years back by saying "I got a training contract with Slaughters this year, and I lied on my application. Said I got 5 A's when I only got [XY grades]". That was quite special.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A bit of a strange attitude. Of course one may also question how many of the English qualified lawyers are working in other countries? Should they all come back and practice only in England & Wales?
    if you wish your business to be a bit international and you know your revenue is going to come from certain quarters of the world, perhaps it makes sense to build a team from those quarters of the world. Being English does not automatically entitle you to work anywhere in the world in much the same way as being a non-European does not entitle one to work in England.
    Just a thought.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Michael Burbridge - you wouldn't mind working abroad involving Indian clients, would you?
    However you do mind sitting next to an Indian lawyer doing the same as what you are doing in the office.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Michael Burbridge - Get a life.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am under the impression that for non-EU nationals to work in the UK they need to have skills that are in short supply/cannot be met in the UK. If they are qualified in Indian law and will work on Indian law transactions from the UK then a work permit would surely be given. If they are to work on English law transactions from the UK then there are lots of graduates from the UK ready and willing to do this work. The position is largely the same across the world. An English qualified solicitor doesn't expect to be able to work on Indian law transactions in India.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It seems to me that MB's comment has been taken out of context and deliberately misconstrued. The point he mas making was that the impact of overseas hires is to reduce the number of openings available to ostensibly well qualified UK candidates. Or is someone now going to suggest that a candidate who has an Oxbridge 2.1 is not ostensibly (and I emphasise that word) well qualified ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It makes sense for firms to hire from abroad,especially from places like India. In the end it provides a way of obtaining contacts with potential clients in emerging markets.
    That overrides any application from an Oxbridge graduate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (60)