The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Barristers and solicitors in North West have joined forces to launch the Northern Administrative Law Association ahead of the proposed regionalisation of the Administrative Court.
Barristers and solicitors in Liverpool and Manchester have joined forces to launch the Northern Administrative Law Association (NALA) ahead of the proposed regionalisation of the Administrative Court.
The association, which has received backing from Mr Justices Blake, Irwin, Langstaff and Ryder, will be chaired by Frances Patterson QC, head of North West set Kings Chambers, who also sits as a deputy high court judge.
Patterson said forming NALA was a direct response to the recommendations made by the judicial working party on Justice Outside London, which was headed by Lord Justice May, and the proposal that regional administrative courts should be brought in from next Easter.
“The association is seeking to strengthen the northern bar’s administrative law practices by providing a forum to share knowledge and information in this particular area of law,” she added. “To facilitate this we have Liverpool University and Manchester University on board to assist with a new training programme.”
As TheLawyer.com revealed (14 November 2007), May LJ’s working party proposed there should be four regional centres of the administrative court outside London in Cardiff, Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. The proposals will see High Court judges sitting outside London more regularly as the working group felt that having nearly all judicial reviews and other claims in the administrative court in London causes “inconvenience and additional expense”, as well as being discriminatory against those who are not based in the South of England.
May LJ’s group was created after the Judicial Executive Board requested in April 2006 recommendations on how Lord Justices and High Court judges could hear cases outside London.