- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (80)
- Employment (47)
- Regulatory and compliance (16)
- Family (15)
- Human Rights (15)
- Crime (12)
- Real Estate (12)
- Planning (10)
- Banking / Finance (7)
- Company/Commercial (6)
- Healthcare (6)
- Immigration (6)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (6)
- Environment (5)
- In-House (5)
- Construction (4)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (4)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Financial services (3)
- Personal Injury (3)
- Personal tax / Trusts (3)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (3)
- Funds (2)
- Information Technology (2)
- Insurance/reinsurance (2)
- Tax (2)
- Agriculture (1)
- Charities (1)
- Competition/EU (1)
- Energy (1)
- Insolvency & restructuring (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Public Sector Watch (1)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
How interesting: the public interest disclosure requirement of s.43B(1) of the Employment Rights Act
Not everything that may be interesting to the public is likely to be ‘in the public interest’. But is that a commonly held or understood view?
TUPE applies where a client decides to engage a new service provider instead of an existing one, but what if the client instructs the existing service provider to remove an employee from the contract before the TUPE transfer takes place?
If local veto rights apply to wind farms what next – prisons, fracking, gypsy sites?
Supreme Court rules that children are in no better position to win asylum than anyone else.
Young country turns to revered legal system.
…and procedural rules for litigants in person: the Re H (Children) case.
The difficulty in TUPE transfers in deciding which employees are transfered to the new employer if the client has given an express instruction that it does not want a particular employee to continue to work on the contract.
The Core Strategy’s approach to use of bare delivery rates prevails over assessment of need.
There is always an employment law dimension in Queen’s Speeches, and this one is no different, says Mugni Islam-Choudhury.
$5m suit may succeed if fans can prove boxer failed to disclose an injury.
There’s less Employment Tribunal advocacy work around now, but one area developing fast is investigations.
Operation Elveden was prompted by evidence heard at the Leveson Inquiry which suggested there was a culture of tabloid newspapers paying public officials for stories.
This is the title of a seminar presented by Tim Jones of No5 Chambers.
An informative summary of private children case law for the Leicester & Leicestershire Family Justice Board.
The subject of Southwell v Blackburn was the correct application of the equitable remedy of proprietary estoppel within the context of a cohabiting couple.
In the first of a series of quarterly round-ups Kathryn Taylor reviews some of the key decisions of the family court, with the emphasis on local authority failings.
The Supreme Court has buried the doubts that arose in UK courts where Sidaway appeared to conflict with later authorities. The case of Montgomery rules.
It goes without saying that physical violence in the workplace is unacceptable. However, that doesn’t mean that the employee should be automatically sacked.
Government plans for huge cuts to the criminal legal aid system could be stopped in their tracks.
Where is the boundary between assistance and being in the arena, and how does the internet impact on that?