- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (89)
- Employment (47)
- Human Rights (17)
- Regulatory and compliance (17)
- Crime (15)
- Family (15)
- Real Estate (14)
- Planning (13)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (8)
- Banking / Finance (7)
- Immigration (7)
- Company/Commercial (6)
- Environment (6)
- Healthcare (6)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (5)
- Construction (5)
- In-House (5)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (5)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (4)
- Corporate (3)
- Financial services (3)
- Information Technology (3)
- Personal Injury (3)
- Personal tax / Trusts (3)
- Funds (2)
- Insurance/reinsurance (2)
- Tax (2)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (2)
- Agriculture (1)
- Charities (1)
- Competition/EU (1)
- Energy (1)
- Insolvency & restructuring (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Privacy and reputation (1)
- Public Sector Watch (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
Russell Holland looks at the recent concerns raised by the TUC in relation to the Agency Worker Regulations.
Louise Corfield looks at what happens when decisions to terminate an employee overlap with a mutual separation.
Charles Crow considers how claimants can move their cases between the tribunal and the court without getting caught by the doctrine of estoppel.
The government has decided not to repeal the TUPE rules on service provision change. Anthony Korn summarises its response to the consultation published earlier this year.
Fatim Kurji considers the meaning of ‘same employment’ within the equal-pay legislation.
Caroline Jennings explores the use of CCTV as evidence in the employment tribunal.
Helen Barney looks at the recent case of Woodhouse v West North West Homes Ltd 2013 UKEAT 0007_12_0506.
A women made a Direct Discrimination claim that she was treated less favourably as a Muslim in not being provided with uninterrupted breaks.
One of the difficulties encountered when advising clients who claim that they have been mis-sold an interest rate hedging product is the paucity of decided case law concerning the sale of such products.
Most employers have a certain standard of dress in the workplace, whether enforced through contractual terms or through customary practices.
Anthony Korn says statutory framework details ‘must change’ to encourage employees to report wrongdoing.
Managing actual or potential conflicts of interest is essential for every professional.
In P and Q v Surrey County Council & Others, the Court of Appeal approved Parker J’s suggested new ‘relative normality’ test for assessing whether or not someone was being deprived of their liberty.
Two challenges to decisions of the secretary of state were heard by Mr Justice Lewis in respect of the ‘Tetbury appeals’.
The claim revolved around the grant of planning permission for a new rugby club and the construction of 200 homes.
AA (Somalia) — Supreme Court says home secretary should amend the refugee family reunion rule for children
The Supreme Court has strongly indicated to the home secretary that she should amend the immigration rules concerning family reunion of children with refugees in the UK.
The Court of Appeal has approved Parker J’s suggested new ‘relative normality’ test for assessing whether or not someone was being deprived of their liberty.
No5 Chambers has released the first edition of its Commercial & Chancery Bulletin for 2014.
Part 4 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill contains a number of important changes to be introduced that seek to prevent judicial review from being a ‘brake on growth’.
This note is intended to provide a brief overview of the Planning Practice Guidance and some of its key features.