Bar top 30 position: 6=
- Employment (11)
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (5)
- Human Rights (3)
- Construction (2)
- Planning (2)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (2)
- Real Estate (2)
- Regulatory and compliance (2)
- Banking / Finance (1)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Company/Commercial (1)
- Corporate (1)
- Family (1)
- Healthcare (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (1)
- Personal Injury (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
AA (Somalia) — Supreme Court says home secretary should amend the refugee family reunion rule for children
The Supreme Court has strongly indicated to the home secretary that she should amend the immigration rules concerning family reunion of children with refugees in the UK.
The claim revolved around the grant of planning permission for a new rugby club and the construction of 200 homes.
Two challenges to decisions of the secretary of state were heard by Mr Justice Lewis in respect of the ‘Tetbury appeals’.
In P and Q v Surrey County Council & Others, the Court of Appeal approved Parker J’s suggested new ‘relative normality’ test for assessing whether or not someone was being deprived of their liberty.
Managing actual or potential conflicts of interest is essential for every professional.
Anthony Korn says statutory framework details ‘must change’ to encourage employees to report wrongdoing.
Most employers have a certain standard of dress in the workplace, whether enforced through contractual terms or through customary practices.
One of the difficulties encountered when advising clients who claim that they have been mis-sold an interest rate hedging product is the paucity of decided case law concerning the sale of such products.
A women made a Direct Discrimination claim that she was treated less favourably as a Muslim in not being provided with uninterrupted breaks.
Helen Barney looks at the recent case of Woodhouse v West North West Homes Ltd 2013 UKEAT 0007_12_0506.
Caroline Jennings explores the use of CCTV as evidence in the employment tribunal.
Fatim Kurji considers the meaning of ‘same employment’ within the equal-pay legislation.
The government has decided not to repeal the TUPE rules on service provision change. Anthony Korn summarises its response to the consultation published earlier this year.
Charles Crow considers how claimants can move their cases between the tribunal and the court without getting caught by the doctrine of estoppel.
Louise Corfield looks at what happens when decisions to terminate an employee overlap with a mutual separation.
Russell Holland looks at the recent concerns raised by the TUC in relation to the Agency Worker Regulations.