- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (15)
- Planning (7)
- Human Rights (5)
- Real Estate (5)
- Construction (4)
- Crime (4)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (3)
- Family (3)
- Healthcare (3)
- Environment (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Public Sector Watch (2)
- Company/Commercial (1)
- Employment (1)
- Immigration (1)
- In-House (1)
- Regulatory and compliance (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
Big majority in favour of Fixed Penalty Notices for fly-tipping.
A Traveller can be both within a protected race, such as an Irish or Scottish Traveller, or a New Traveller, and other aspects of law.
Unison appeal dismissed. Now we await the review.
More power to those with learning disabilities or autism, and their families.
Traveller status has been redefined...
The format of any investigation could be of great importance.
Practical implications of judgment for developers’ negotiations on small-scale and brownfield sites.
…after council prosecuted a defective Breach of Condition notice...
Judgment of interest to all those involved in local plan examination.
A practical guide on the pitfalls local planning authorities should avoid.
In the first of a series of quarterly round-ups Kathryn Taylor reviews some of the key decisions of the family court, with the emphasis on local authority failings.
This paper considers selected topics in the broad (and full of case law) topic of homeless persons, together with a brief mention of the duty of local housing authorities to carry out a review of accommodation needs.
Laura Davidson acts for successful local authority in COP case ousting abusive live-in carers from an elderly woman’s home
London Borough of Redbridge v G, C and F was initially brought under the inherent jurisdiction due to concerns that C and F were unduly influencing G.
This article focuses on the changes brought about by the decisions in Re A (Children: Habitual Residence)  UKSC 60 and LC (children)  UKSC 1.
Two challenges to decisions of the secretary of state were heard by Mr Justice Lewis in respect of the ‘Tetbury appeals’.
In P and Q v Surrey County Council & Others, the Court of Appeal approved Parker J’s suggested new ‘relative normality’ test for assessing whether or not someone was being deprived of their liberty.