Bar top 30 position: 6=
- Employment (16)
- Human Rights (8)
- Crime (5)
- Family (5)
- Real Estate (5)
- Banking / Finance (4)
- Company/Commercial (3)
- Construction (3)
- Healthcare (3)
- Immigration (3)
- Planning (3)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (3)
- Regulatory and compliance (3)
- Funds (2)
- Insurance/reinsurance (2)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (2)
- Personal tax / Trusts (2)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (2)
- Agriculture (1)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Competition/EU (1)
- Corporate (1)
- Financial services (1)
- Information Technology (1)
- Insolvency & restructuring (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Personal Injury (1)
- Tax (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
This recent case in the Court of Protection considered best interests in the context of a minimally conscious patient.
Late last month, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment on the cases of two severely disabled men who want other people to help them to die.
The Criminal Justice and Courts Bill, which introduces significant changes to judicial review, is making rapid progress through Parliament.
Mugni Islam-Choudhury reports on the latest developments on restrictive covenants following Merlin Financial Consultants Ltd v Cooper and Prophet plc v Huggett.
The claimant was placed at risk of redundancy with a number of other employees. They were all given the option of choosing voluntary redundancy or redeployment.
Rolling back from William Davis? A note on the significance of Dartford Borough Council v Secretary of State for DCLG
On 24 June 2014 Mrs Justice Patterson handed down judgment in the case of Dartford Borough Council.
Laura Davidson acts for successful local authority in COP case ousting abusive live-in carers from an elderly woman’s home
London Borough of Redbridge v G, C and F was initially brought under the inherent jurisdiction due to concerns that C and F were unduly influencing G.
In Lock v British Gas, the European Court of Justice decided that holiday pay under the Working Time Directive has to include commission if salary is made up of commission.
At any time, as those who have suffered a serious injury to the brain or have been close to someone who has will know, your life can be turned upside down in less than a fated second.
Following the grant of permission in TN and MA (Afghanistan) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 1609, there is a listing for the appeal in the Supreme Court in April/May 2015.
Irvine Maccabe reviews new statutory provisions outlawing race discrimination in Jersey.
Wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, or both? That is the question posed by Charles Crow and Alexander Mellis.
Anthony Korn reviews the EAT’s ruling in Donnelley Global Document Solutions Group Ltd v Besagni and others (EAT/0397/13).
Russell Holland and Russell Bailey consider the impact of the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Hainsworth v Ministry of Defence.
Richard Adkinson considers the ruling of the First Chambers of the CJEU in Gülay Bollacke v K + K Klaas & Kock BV & Co KG.
ME v Sweden — Strasbourg rules no violation of article 3 for Sweden to temporarily expel a gay man to Libya
The ECHR has declared admissible on article 3 grounds an application from a gay man regarding his expulsion from Sweden to Libya.
Routes to financial redress against banks, investment advisers, insurers, mortgage advisers and product providers
Susanne Muth discusses some pertinent and recurring themes encountered in the commercial and chancery area of practice.
The aim is that judges of all levels of seniority will be able to sit in the same building and cases can be allocated to the most appropriate judge.
Mugni Islam-Choudhury considers the new rules on pre-claim conciliation which become compulsory from 6 May 2014.
Tim Sheppard of No5 Chambers reviews the recent challenge to tribunal fees.