Bar top 30 position: 6=
- Employment (15)
- Human Rights (7)
- Family (5)
- Real Estate (5)
- Crime (4)
- Banking / Finance (3)
- Construction (3)
- Immigration (3)
- Planning (3)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (3)
- Regulatory and compliance (3)
- Company/Commercial (2)
- Funds (2)
- Healthcare (2)
- Insurance/reinsurance (2)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (2)
- Personal tax / Trusts (2)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (2)
- Agriculture (1)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Financial services (1)
- Information Technology (1)
- Insolvency & restructuring (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Personal Injury (1)
- Tax (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
The claimant was placed at risk of redundancy with a number of other employees. They were all given the option of choosing voluntary redundancy or redeployment.
Rolling back from William Davis? A note on the significance of Dartford Borough Council v Secretary of State for DCLG
On 24 June 2014 Mrs Justice Patterson handed down judgment in the case of Dartford Borough Council.
Laura Davidson acts for successful local authority in COP case ousting abusive live-in carers from an elderly woman’s home
London Borough of Redbridge v G, C and F was initially brought under the inherent jurisdiction due to concerns that C and F were unduly influencing G.
In Lock v British Gas, the European Court of Justice decided that holiday pay under the Working Time Directive has to include commission if salary is made up of commission.
At any time, as those who have suffered a serious injury to the brain or have been close to someone who has will know, your life can be turned upside down in less than a fated second.
Following the grant of permission in TN and MA (Afghanistan) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 1609, there is a listing for the appeal in the Supreme Court in April/May 2015.
Irvine Maccabe reviews new statutory provisions outlawing race discrimination in Jersey.
Wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, or both? That is the question posed by Charles Crow and Alexander Mellis.
Anthony Korn reviews the EAT’s ruling in Donnelley Global Document Solutions Group Ltd v Besagni and others (EAT/0397/13).
Russell Holland and Russell Bailey consider the impact of the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Hainsworth v Ministry of Defence.
Richard Adkinson considers the ruling of the First Chambers of the CJEU in Gülay Bollacke v K + K Klaas & Kock BV & Co KG.
ME v Sweden — Strasbourg rules no violation of article 3 for Sweden to temporarily expel a gay man to Libya
The ECHR has declared admissible on article 3 grounds an application from a gay man regarding his expulsion from Sweden to Libya.
Routes to financial redress against banks, investment advisers, insurers, mortgage advisers and product providers
Susanne Muth discusses some pertinent and recurring themes encountered in the commercial and chancery area of practice.
The aim is that judges of all levels of seniority will be able to sit in the same building and cases can be allocated to the most appropriate judge.
Mugni Islam-Choudhury considers the new rules on pre-claim conciliation which become compulsory from 6 May 2014.
Tim Sheppard of No5 Chambers reviews the recent challenge to tribunal fees.
Nabila Mallick summarises the key points of immigration law for employers.
Court hearings in the UK are generally conducted on an adversarial basis where each litigant presents his or her own case and attacks the other side’s case.
Russell Bailey considers the circumstances in which a procedural error may lead to a finding of unfair dismissal.
Naomi Owen considers the pros and cons of applying for a postponement when criminal proceedings are p...