- Employment (29)
- Human Rights (9)
- Regulatory and compliance (9)
- Family (8)
- Real Estate (8)
- Crime (7)
- Banking / Finance (6)
- Healthcare (5)
- Planning (5)
- Company/Commercial (4)
- Immigration (4)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (4)
- Construction (3)
- Corporate (2)
- Financial services (2)
- Funds (2)
- Information Technology (2)
- Insurance/reinsurance (2)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (2)
- Personal tax / Trusts (2)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (2)
- Tax (2)
- Agriculture (1)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Competition/EU (1)
- Environment (1)
- In-House (1)
- Insolvency & restructuring (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Personal Injury (1)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
Government plans for huge cuts to the criminal legal aid system could be stopped in their tracks.
Where is the boundary between assistance and being in the arena, and how does the internet impact on that?
Helen Barney discusses the landmark Employment Appeal Tribunal case concerning holiday pay of Bear Scotland & others v Fulton & Ors, Hertel (UK) Ltd v Mr Woods & Ors and Amec Group Ltd v Mr Law & Ors.
Irvine Maccabe discusses practical issues and strategies to consider in relation to recusal, judicial misconduct and transcripts.
Anthony Korn considers the Court of Appeal ruling in Sunrise Brokers LLP v Rogers .
Russell Holland reviews the case of Game v Laws, which concerned an employee who was dismissed for making offensive “tweets”.
The question of whether two parties have entered in to a binding settlement compromising a case is often just as (if not more) acrimonious matter as the substantive case.
Naomi Owen looks at the recent decision from HHJ Eady QC in Blackwood v Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust .
Gypsies and travellers have played a major role in human rights litigation both in the European Court of Human Rights and in UK courts...
Judges make mistakes and legal error is accepted.
On the 15 December Mr Justice Keehan handed down his judgment in six connected cases involving child sexual exploitation.
Philip Dayle, barrister at No5 Chambers, recently presented a case upate at the Judicial Review seminars, which were held in Birmingham and London.
This paper considers selected topics in the broad (and full of case law) topic of homeless persons, together with a brief mention of the duty of local housing authorities to carry out a review of accommodation needs.
This briefing examines a number of misconceptions about boundary interpretation — ‘the myths’ — and looks at one or two legends along the way.
Proprietary estoppel prevents the legal owner of property from asserting their strict legal rights in respect of that property when it would be inequitable to allow him to do so.
On 31 October, the Supreme Court handed down its decisions regarding two applications for leave to appeal by air carriers Thomson and Jet 2.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled that overtime (voluntary or not) should be taken into account when holiday pay is calculated.
The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 came into force on 31 January 2014.
Redhill Aerodrome: special circumstances in green belt cases — Court of Appeal holds that there is no change in the framework
Do the words ‘any other harm’ in ‘very special circumstances’ test in the second sentence of paragraph 88 of the framework mean ‘any other harm to the green belt’?
Given the volume of planning decisions in the last six months or so, this paper is necessarily selective.