- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (6)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (5)
- Healthcare (4)
- Employment (3)
- Family (3)
- Charities (2)
- Company/Commercial (2)
- Crime (2)
- Construction (1)
- Environment (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Insolvency & restructuring (1)
- Planning (1)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (1)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (1)
- Real Estate (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
The award was presented to Bill and Stella Jackman to recognise their 30 years of dedicated support to Headway Suffolk.
In November 2014, Adam Farrer from No5 Chambers acted for the HSE in the prosecution of a care-home company at Cardiff Crown Court.
No5 Chambers will be exhibiting at a one-day conference exploring the implications of the changes brought about by the Children and Families Act 2014.
No5 Chambers’ Nageena Khalique has appeared in the Court of Appeal to represent a protected party who lacked the capacity to make a decision about amputation.
At any time, as those who have suffered a serious injury to the brain or have been close to someone who has will know, your life can be turned upside down in less than a fated second.
Ian Bridge of No5 Chambers, instructed by Shakespeares, has defended a major supplier of sand and aggregates based in the south east.
Philip Williams from No5 Chambers, instructed by Jacqui Kendall at Plexus Law, has represented the Dover Roman Painted House Trust in a damages case.
No5 Chambers is sponsoring this year’s Child Brain Injury Trust Conference and Exhibition, which is due to take place on 26 March in Manchester.
Barrister Adam Farrer from No5 Chambers has acted for the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) in two catastrophic brain injury cases.
The Chambers UK Bar Guide has ranked No5 Chambers in 15 practice areas.
Dr Simon Fox, a member of No5 Chambers’ clinical negligence and personal injury groups, has been shortlisted for barrister of the year at the Bristol Law Society’s 2013 Awards.
Charles Crow considers how claimants can move their cases between the tribunal and the court without getting caught by the doctrine of estoppel.