The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Helen Sage is right to draw attention to the lack of accreditation of experts, particularly in medicine (The Lawyer 12 March).
She quotes me in this regard, upon the Law Society Directory of Experts, recently published by FT Law & Tax. I am alleged to have said the directory is "not worth the paper it is written on".
I do not recall using that phrase and if I did, I was wrong. Since I was involved in the publication of the directory and wrote the introduction to the medical specialities, it must be clear that I support the publication. The point I was attempting to make was that the directory was not a form of accreditation although many subscribers suppose that it is.
The Law Society directory does not set out to be a form of accreditation, requiring only two referees for entry. The directory is useful but it does not fulfil the requirement of providing a source of accreditation for the high street solicitor.