Baker & McKenzie plans expansion into DIFC

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Readers' comments (1)

  • Almost all (if not all) of the law firms operating in the DIFC have an onshore license. Its not either / or - as far as where a firm is licensed to operate - but rather where it chooses to have its offices. Rents in DIFC are higher than elsewhere in Dubai, but its a well located located hub for banks who do benefit from its status as a financial free zone, and the law firms like living next door to the banks.

    The employment laws are different also - with better employee protection, more generous end of service benefits and a small claims court. Law firms are allowed to be 100% foreign owned wherever they operate - and as such, this is not a particular advantage of operating in the DIFC.

    BAM HAM are probably trying to demonstrate that they are an international firm - having taken on a firm that was very local in nature (Dr Habib being well regarded). Lots of banks are there - and there is a lot of competition for banking work already. Being in DIFC won't improve the chances of getting banking work - its not a prerequisite. However, having strong, highly experienced transactional banking lawyers who are English qualified is.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields


Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (1)