Russells partner agrees to pay damages to JK Rowling over confidentiality breach

  • Print
  • Comments (11)

Readers' comments (11)

  • Regarding loss of anonymity vs gain of publicity: the anonymity had a particular value to her, as it was a property that she could control. Potentially she could have written 7 books under the pen name and built a ton of hype along the lines of "Who is Robert Galbraith", which could have resulted in greater profits than being exposed early against her will.

    So I would say that the anonymity has a value - hard to quantify admittedly - which is not to be offset against the immediate profits from being revealed.

    It's a very unusual point of law and a shame that we didn't get the benefit of a judgment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields


Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (11)