The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) have avoided a £140m court showdown with London Underground (LUL) after settling a professional negligence case just weeks before it was due to be heard.
The case, thought to be among the largest ever filed against a City firm, was due to be heard over four weeks in October with London Underground bringing in Ince & Co partner Charlotte Davies and Justin Fenwick QC of 4 New Square to lead the battle.
The Lawyer revealed in July 2011 that Freshfields had been hit with the suit, which was originally for £178.5m, but was reduced after LUL managed to recoup £36.54m from other sources (25 July 2011).
Legacy Herbert Smith, which was named as a second defendant in the suit a year later, had vowed to “vigorously defend” the claim, which centred on advice provided by the firms to the company on its 2003 public-private partnership (PPP) deal with collapsed transport company Metronet (28 November 2012 ).
At issue were claims by LUL that the firms were negligent in their advice relating to its 2003 PPP with collapsed transport company Metronet. In April 2003 LUL entered into a PPP with Metronet for the renovation of seven underground lines. Together they created special purpose companies so ownership of the lines would pass to Metronet when the work was complete.
When financing was agreed with the special purpose companies’ banks, LUL entered into put option agreements on the bonds issued as part of the fundraising. These agreements stipulated that if any of the special purpose companies were to become insolvent LUL would purchase their debt. When the companies went into administration in July 2007 LUL had to pay £1.74bn in respect of that debt.
LUL claimed the sum would have been much lower if it had been allowed to repay the bonds at the market price. It alleged that a drafting error approved by the firms without reference to LUL meant it had to pay out on the put options instead.