The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Lewis Silkin’s client House of Fraser (HoF) has lost a High Court battle against Jack Wills for infringing its company logo of a pheasant in a top hat and cane.
Jack Wills logo
Preppy fashion label Jack Wills instructed Mishcon de Reya after finding that a pigeon in a hat logo on some of HoF’s clothing is too similar to its own emblem. Mishcon’s head of IP Jeremy Hertzog instructed Hogarth Chambers’ Roger Wyand QC and Andrew Norris to lead the claim.
The complaint was that the logo was likely to confuse customers because of the resemblence between the two birds.
In his ruling Mr Justice Arnold said that the resemblance of HoF’s pigeon logo would have “increased the attraction of its goods in circumstances where House of Fraser did not undertake any advertising or promotion of those goods.”
Hertzog said: “This case is a paradigm example of a retailer sailing too close to the wind in aping the get-up of a famous brand for a lookalike product. Jack Wills had to take action to preserve the distinctiveness of its famous pheasant trade mark; had it not done so, the floodgates would have opened to a plethora of other clothing brands using emblems of birds wearing top hats and other human adornments. By winning this case, Jack Wills has marked that out as its territory alone.”