The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
If the courts were privatised, as some suggested they could be, the taxpayer would save £1bn a year in staff and running costs.
Projects like the £300m Rolls Building could pay for themselves with wealthy litigants such as Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich paying above the odds to have their cases heard by London’s top line judiciary. The little matter of a £9.5m loss caused by the closure of the Electronic Working System little more than a year after the court opened would be sucked up by a corporate owner, not us the taxpayer.
The MoJ may be denying privatisation plans for the time being but any tinkering by the Justice Secretary Chris Grayling will raise questions and eyebrows across the profession.
Many lawyers believe justice is already under attack by way of mammoth legal aid reforms, what would the privatisation of our court system means for those on lower incomes?
Many are already finding themselves locked out of justice because of cuts to the legal aid budget and the end of the no-win no-fee system (Lord Justice Jackson has just been appointed to hear appeals concerning his reforms) and now the prospect of taking the courts away from the independent HM Courts and Tribunal Service.