Gordons prepares for JR over York burial for Richard III

  • Print
  • Comments (38)

Readers' comments (38)

  • Didn't Richard III say "Kill all lawyers"?
    Well surely he would have made an exception for Neil Warwick of Dickinson Dees who has penned this Private Eye worthy piece on the subject? http://www.nebusiness.co.uk/business-news/business-comment/2013/04/10/what-we-can-learn-from-richard-iii-51140-33146349/

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with those who have their doubts about the validity of R3's descendants. But the fact is that this - probably much libelled - king belongs to the North of England - not just the city of York, or at all York, for that matter. I bet you Richard wanted to be buried in Middleham Parish Church, or perhaps Westminster Abbey. Leicester, someone said has chronic want of tourism. If you are ever unlucky enough to visit there, boy, you will glimpse why. We the taxpayers, pay for the University in that town, so, ultimately it is our say alone where King Dick is buried.
    Some have implied that the people of the North let Richard down at Bosworth. I would point out that he was betrayed by the insidious liar and malefactor, Percy of Northumberland, who currently resides on a spit in Beelzebub's Deepest Cellar, joyously placed there by the good people of Thirsk and Northallerton some 500 years ago. Give us back our true, if adopted son, to be buried in the place which he for one loved!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dux needs to read his history books. There was a Christian bishop sitting in Leicester before ever there was one in Norwich, Durham, Salisbury among others. The diocese fell when the danes invaded Mercia causing the saxon bishop of Leicester to flee to Dorchester.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The problem is that Richard III was a king of England - so in a sense we all have a say in what happens to his remains. I believe the discovery of his remains transcends normal archeological practice. The Ministry of Justice should have intervened and given Parliament, as our representatives, a free vote to decide where and how to rebury the remains. We take care over the remains of soldiers who died in the First World War, why should we not exercise similar care for Richard III? There are a number of choices for a final resting place - in the absence of a definitive instruction from the king - Westminster Abbey (where his wife and successor are buried), St George's Chapel, Windsor (where his brother, Edward IV is buried), Tewksbury Abbey (where his brother, George is buried), York (where his father was executed - and probably his spiritual home) and Leicester (where his remains were found). I support the legal challenge because I think the Ministry of Justice have been cavalier in their approach to the issues involved and they need to (be told to) think again!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This all is such a waste of time and money . Laugh or the stupidity of the situation will make you cry.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have to say that, apart from the first two anonymous comments which are witless, most of these comments are hilarious! I was in favour of the Plantagenet alliance when I first heard this news, but my mind has been changed not being able to work out who they are and by the people pointing out that there is no real evidence Richard wanted to be buried at York. On the other hand, Leicester seems to have been in indecent haste to create opportunities to make money out of him. I agree with Henry VII - create a tomb & memorial at Bosworth where he fell. Shakespeare does indeed have a lot to answer for!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My Wife and I both believe that in lieu of Richard not being able to be buried at Westminster Abbey as a King Of England, that the next best place would be York Minster. During his lifetime he loved the North more than he loved the Midlands or South.
    He was of the House Of York, not Leicester.
    The only association I can think of with Leicester is the proximity to it`s site to his defeat at Bosworth and where he was taken after the battle and after being degraded and dehumanised he was thrown into a grave, probably naked.
    Most of all, as Richard was baptised as a Roman Catholic he has the human right to expect a decent Roman Catholic burial no-matter where he ends up.
    Rather than Cities argue over the place of his burial, potentially for ecconomic reasons, we believe that it should be considered where Richard would have wanted to be buried if it was possible to ask him.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Richard III was Catholic and received a Catholic burial in a Catholic monastery. Why is it now proposed that he have an Anglican re-burial?
    Nobody would suggest that the Queen (Anglican) should have a Catholic burial, so why is the opposite constellation valid and desirable?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (38)