The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Weil Gotshal & Manges has led a successful application to the High Court to clarify the right of clients of MF Global UK to claim money from the general estate of the collapsed broker.
On Friday (16 August) Mr Justice David Richards ruled in favour of the bulk of the client money shortfall application, made by MF Global’s administrators. He found that MF Global clients can only claim against the general estate of the broker for contractual claims which have not been paid and are not expected to be paid from the client money pool.
The application was made because the MF Global UK client money pool holds around $1bn, but client money claims are expected to be in excess of that amount. The administrators, who instructed Weil when MF Global collapsed in late 2011 (1 November 2011), wanted the High Court to determine whether clients can also make unsecured claims against the general estate and how those claims should be calculated.
A pair of representative respondents were attached to the application, represented by Simmons & Simmons and Dentons.
In addition to the main issue, the application also asked whether clients could claim against the general estate for any difference between the value of their claims against the client money pool, and the amount expected to be recovered from the pool.
Richards J ruled that clients can make such claims if they arise from a failure by MF Global to comply with the provisions of chapter 7 of the FSA’s Client Assets Sourcebook (known as CASS 7), but only if and to the extent that, when added to a client’s expected recoveries from the client money pool, that claim would exceed the value of the client’s contractual claim. Clients will accordingly be unable to claim in full against both estates.
However on a third issue Richard J found in favour of ‘decreased clients’ - those whose net open positions when MF Global went into liquidation closed with a liquidation value of less than their market value. He said that MF Global had defaulted in its obligation to maintain client money at the required level, and therefore clients had suffered an actual loss and there was “a clear case for equitable compensation”.
The news follows a settlement between the UK and US estates of MF Global earlier this year (9 January 2013).
The legal line-up:
For the applicants, Richard Heis, Michael Pink and Richard Fleming (joint administrators of MF Global UK)