Law Society to students: legal career may be too risky

  • Print
  • Comments (78)

Readers' comments (78)

  • I have just completed the LPC part-time, having done the GDL part-time before that, on top of my first degree. My university law careers dept has been constantly encouraging and supportive, but I feel strongly that the downside was not laid out in stark enough terms from the outset. The reality is that I'm 42, with a family, from a non-legal background and facing the worst recession for decades. Admittedly the last item was not foreseen when I started my law studies, but at no point did careers officers or tutors advise me to slow down or take another year to think about it before handing over more cheques. Four years on and with a debt like an albatross, I'm punch-drunk with rejection letters and (so far) continuing with my previous career. I thought I was under no illusions about the difficulties of qualifying when I started (three family members have qualified), I knew it would be very tough and my age was against me, but this road just seems to get steeper and steeper. My advice is to be wary - in this business having strong academics, bags of commitment and great transferable skills seems to be no substitute for 6 months' paralegal experience. And good luck finding that without 6 month's paralegal experience first. And good luck finding that without 6 month's paralegal experience first. And good luck finding that without 6 month's paralegal experience first. Etc. etc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Isn't this simply the Law Society doing what the FSA insists on regarding warnings around investments?

    "The value of your investment may go up or down"

    That is to say, by investing £10k in the LPC, you may not get a training contract and hence a career in law at the end of it.

    Seems like sensible advice to me!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am one of those people who has a law degree and the LPC and absolutely no prospect of ever becoming a lawyer. I am in an insurmountable amount of debt in addition to being about as employable as a school leaver with the earning prospects of one. I'm nearly 26 and haven't managed to start my life properly. I'm really angry about it. The sad thing about it is I would make a good lawyer too. I intend to campaign to have these debts written off. Thinking only professionalism equals success, I tried to get ahead by pursuing a career in law but have ended up so far behind. It's not right. Why should I have to have the stigma of being a bankrupt attached to me if that is the only way to cancel the mountains of debt I have aquired? I have never been financially irresponsible or reckless in my life.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is only going to lead to more institutional discrimination in the legal profession. I pity the future generations.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am about to enter in to my final year of the LLB course at a mediocre university and believe students today are made fully aware that a 2:1 and the LPC are not enough to ensure becoming a solicitor. Since my first day at my University I have been made aware that it is what else you bring to the table that secures you your place, tons of work experience is not enough especially when not in the sectors of the law for which you are applying, it is continually re-inforced throughout the course that you must offer more than what is written on the degree certificate at the end of it all, it is all about personality and dedication.

    Those students who do not gain the necessary extras are those who are not dedicated enough. A student who really wants to suceed will do their research and should quite easily discover that it is a bad time to be entering into the law, with the economy the way it is every school leaver is looking for a career in which there will always be opportunities and the law offers this. There is no need to not allow those under thirty to do the GDL as this would indeed cancel out the opportunities for some of those people who are very intellectual and do indeed have more to bring to the table than some unaware and unenthusiastic student who scraped a 2:1 from a low standing university with no extra-curricular interest.

    On the whole the system does not need to change, if anything it ensures that the law is not easy to enter in to. Any student will inform you of this - me especially having friends who are studying for less intense courses such as Events Management and Disabilities Studies who all get to enjoy the freedom of university while i am confined to the library a lot more often than them. Any student with the commitment and will power to truly want to suceed will do and therefore there is no need to change anything.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You cannot simply say abolish the GDL or law degree is simply the best. A "law degree" cannot be the same if someone has studied it at Oxford and another at Manchester metropolitan. What about those who have studied good subjects like history, politics and economics from a top 10 uni but have allways wanted to go into law. Are you seriously saying someone at an ex poly should come before these?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Don't study the law, irrespective of your academic record to date, if you can identify yourself as being one or more of the towns people in the film High Plains Drifter starring Clint Eastwood. The reviews of the film I have read are quite superficial and may even indicate that the reviewer has not watched the film. If you fully undestand the film then perhaps you are QC material?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The whole recruitment system is flawed and needs to be overhauled. Law is tough and demanding and the recruitment and application system should be tough and demanding.
    The problem is too many people who are simply not good enough are allowed to progress too far down the process incurring substantial amounts of debt before realising they will never get a training contract, and too many people who really have very little interest in being lawyers (and are often not very good) are able to get training contracts because they went to the right schoold and mummy/daddy know the right people.
    The fact that LPC providers run themselves as businesses encouraging as many people to enrol on their expensive courses as possible does not help.
    I think the US system has a lot of merit to it in that it cuts the weak links off at a much earlier stage.
    Possible solution - you can't do the LPC without a training contract. You can only apply for a training contract once you have graduated. How you fill up any year in the middle is up to the individual. At least this way, people don't burn themselves with debt and may only lose one or two years as opposed to several if you go down the GDL/LPC/Paralegal/give up route.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • While I appreciate the comments that those who are intelligent enough to work in the legal profession are intelligent enough to work out there are tough times ahead, I think there is much to be said about illustrating the severity of the current situation (although whether this is the role of the Law Society I am not convinced).
    As someone who has just completed the LPC, have studied the GDL and done 3 years at uni and am yet to secure a training contract, I am in the (un)fortunate position of understanding the harsh realities of pursuing a legal career in these tough times. Having gained a 2.1 degree from a red brick uni, a commendation in my GDL, a distinction in my LPC, formal work experience from a magic circle and a regional firm, not to mention informal experience at a sole practitioner and even a barristers chambers to explore my interest in advocacy, I am consistently being taken to final interview and then missing out at the last hurdle.
    Brilliant feedback from law school careers advisors, Magic Circle firms and national firms alike does not decrease my sense of annoyance and anxiety as my debt increases daily by the interest I cannot earn enough in my temp job to pay off. I have informed both family and friends that if my training contract interviews this summer (to commence training contracts in Sept 2011) do not come to fruition I am going to have to swallow my pride (and my debt filled tears) and embark on an entirely different career if I am ever to have a hope of getting myself out of the dire financial straits I am currently in.
    And a word of caution for those thinking the situation will improve - talk of the economy picking up in the years to come resulting in an increase in available jobs needs to be taken with caution. Not only will the number of students applying for a "prestigious, well paid" career remain undoubtedly high regardless of warnings, you will also be competing with those already qualified for these jobs. And if you are competing against someone already qualified you are at a distinct disadvantage - not only does the firm know what they are getting qualification wise, qualified applicants are likely to have at least a couple of years of work experience, and better yet? Firms don't have to fork out the £15k fees associated with taking a risk on someone yet to qualify from law school.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To the chap who posted above about not getting a training contract.
    This illustrates the point that only those who have secured a training contract should be allowed to progress to studying the LPC.
    If one undertake the costs of the LPC without a training contract then that individual accepts that it is more likely than not that he/she will end up as employable as a school leaver.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (78)