News International refers Times lawyer to SRA over NightJack

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Readers' comments (2)

  • Such a shame that the Times thought that an expose of a man merely trying to do the right thing was a story. How do the editors that dreamed up this story sleep at night? And while Justice Eady may well have merely been applying the law, it is a shame that he couldn't have seen through this trash.
    Whose life was improved by the unmasking of Night Jack?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Someone wants to publicise information the police would prefer not to see in the public domain - no injunction, he is effectively stopped and exposed. A Premiership footballer seeks an injunction to hide his indiscretions: no problem sir, when would you like it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

  • Print
  • Comments (2)