News International refers Times lawyer to SRA over NightJack

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Readers' comments (2)

  • Such a shame that the Times thought that an expose of a man merely trying to do the right thing was a story. How do the editors that dreamed up this story sleep at night? And while Justice Eady may well have merely been applying the law, it is a shame that he couldn't have seen through this trash.
    Whose life was improved by the unmasking of Night Jack?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Someone wants to publicise information the police would prefer not to see in the public domain - no injunction, he is effectively stopped and exposed. A Premiership footballer seeks an injunction to hide his indiscretions: no problem sir, when would you like it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (2)