SFO Tchenguiz legal fees rise as disclosure exercise delays trial

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Readers' comments (1)

  • It is to be hoped that Queens Bench take a more serious view of disclosure obligations than the rabble in Chancery. Under the new rules of 1.4.13 SFO should probably be debarred from adducing any evidence in support of their case even if they 'disclose' which is still very much a self cert excercise. On the doorstep judges are very unsympathetic to the wronged party in discosure - why?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (1)