The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Commercial litigators say a pre-action protocol on handling debt claims may lead to court-room mayhem if it becomes law because of the time restriction it imposes.
Under the protocol, judges will have the power to award adverse costs against defendants if they do not respond to claims with a full case outline within a week. Parties are also given only seven days to decide on a mutually acceptable expert.
But debt claims lawyers are complaining that in other areas litigators are given a much longer time to prepare their cases.
Michael Polonsky, litigation partner at Paisner & Co, says: "It would be unworkable and it is contrary to the Woolf philosophy, which wants to free up the court process.
"In a clinical negligence case you allow three months for a defendant to respond. If you are making a claim which is a personal injury claim, you are recommended that the letter of claim, facts, and such like, should be sent and the defendant should reply in 21 days.
"These rules do not apply to the pre-action debt claim protocol."
A leading legal management consultant, says: "It is impossible to do this in such a short period of time.
"There should be a bench mark of three months or something."