Nabarro Nabarro heads east with City HQ move confirmed By Sam Chadderton 21 December 2012 11:46 17 December 2015 11:30 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Anonymous 28 December 2012 at 07:24 Out of the frying pan, into the fire. So Nabarro have finally managed to exit the (completely duff) management decision to move from the west end in 1999 to land in the total dump that is Theobalds Rd. But to go where? Another dump. “Outstanding Property”? Who are you kidding Mr Johnston? JP Morgan exited this second hand space years ago and no-one in the market would touch it. And in the middle of the worst recession in a generation, where most savvy tenants are stealing great deals, that so called ‘leading property firm’ Nabarro have managed to overpay by a mile. £46 a foot? Good deal? Do me a favour. If that was your parting gift and legacy Mr Johnston, you’ve sealed your exit with the crowning glory of your all your other duff management decisions over 10 years. This firm will not survive in its current form. Reply Link Anonymous 2 January 2013 at 13:58 I see the disgruntled former employee that posts under every single Nabarro article with negative comments has had his say. I was waiting for that one. Next… Reply Link Anonymous 2 January 2013 at 17:27 Even those of us who have never worked for Nabarro can clearly see that this building is hideous, badly located and hardly cheap. Reply Link Anonymous 2 January 2013 at 23:05 Nabarro PR machine needs to do better than that. Not a particularly robust defence. The points havent been dealt with. Reply Link Anonymous 3 January 2013 at 14:51 They could have done a lot better than that… They looked at this building as alternate to Lacon House. Having said that they are next door to Linklaters and Slaughter and May who both occupy equally dreary buildings and unlike most of the firms who located to swanky new offices they will not be desperately to offload space to account for the new realities Reply Link Anonymous 3 January 2013 at 15:21 How is being close to Links and Slaughters relevant? They have excellent buildings and took them years ago at a smart/low rent (and Link recently re-geared their lease on the same basis). There are council flats not much more than a stone’s throw from Eaton Square – but I dont want to live in one of them (although at least I’d be paying a sensible rent). The point is, Nabarro had a vast array of buildings to look at, and chose an expensive dog. What does that say about the decision makers there? Why not choose a building you might actually want to (and can afford to) stay in for 20 rather than 10 years? Reply Link Anonymous 3 January 2013 at 17:32 A departing Partner (and therefore one who might have a negative view of things) told me he had looked at the terms and that it was a sensible move being made on good terms. Reply Link Anonymous 4 January 2013 at 00:12 So you wanted them to go for a swankier building, but for less money? Well I’m sure they never thought of any of these things and just plumped for the nearest available space… And you also think they should be looking longer term, but have in previous articles complained about their lack of merger? Your opinion is clearly uninformed and driven by bitterness or boredom. Trolling, some call it. Reply Link Anonymous 4 January 2013 at 12:38 Were Nabarros lured east by the promise of a cat cafe? http://now-here-this.timeout.com/2013/01/04/meow-thats-a-good-idea-cat-cafe-to-open-in-east-london/ Reply Link Anonymous 4 January 2013 at 13:24 Never thought of that. Hey, Anon at 0:12 – why so prickly? Get some sleep instead of being so grumpy (blogging after midnight is clearly not good for you). No-one suggested ‘swanky or expensive’, just a decent building in a good location at a sensible rent in the current market. Who recommend a building that achieved none of these? So you didnt take a 20 year lease because you want to be attractive to a merger partner? Good luck with that. Reply Link Anonymous 7 January 2013 at 18:12 If this debate were informed by knowledge of:- i) the length of the rent free period Nabarros negotiated; ii) the fit out contribution Nabarros is to receive;and iii) the number of tenant’s breaks operable before 2025 then one could make an informed judgment about the commercial terms. Reply Link Anonymous 9 January 2013 at 14:24 Ha,ha,ha, this thread is becoming more like mumsnet every day. Reply Link Anonymous 9 January 2013 at 14:55 A headline rent of £46 psf is not a bad rent in the current market. Due to market conditions there has been very little development recently (except for the tower developments, and they will be significantly more expensive than £46) and that lack of development has had an impact on the supply and demand dynamic i.e. there is very limited supply. There are no suitable buildings with rents below £40 in todays market. I still think Nabarro is a firm in desperate trouble trying to find it’s place in the world, and I’m not sure if it has one, but on pure economics this is not a bad deal. Reply Link Anonymous 10 January 2013 at 17:24 The move to Theobalds Road was done on very favourable terms and the building was a huge improvement on the frankly awful conditions in Stratton Street. I was there for both and the location in Theobalds was never a real issue – people just got on with it and there was a real noticeable lift in confidence after we had moved in. Reply Link Anonymous 13 January 2013 at 21:27 The “lift in confidence” the last poster speaks of didn’t last long. All soon realised the shiny new building was located in a barren wilderness. The firm never grasped the opportunities that the boom times of 2002-2007 presented. Barely any growth, zero direction, poor leadership. 10+ years on, new management, where is the firm going? Well we know the location, but as to direction, maybe the Nabarro stalwarts can tell us. Even if the rent is acceptable (a question better answered by others) what is new management’s game plan to arrest the slide and move into positive territory. Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.