- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (60)
- Company/Commercial (54)
- Funds (47)
- Banking / Finance (34)
- Corporate (32)
- Financial services (30)
- Personal tax / Trusts (29)
- Insolvency & restructuring (19)
- Regulatory and compliance (19)
- Employment (17)
- Tax (16)
- Real Estate (10)
- Crime (7)
- Other (6)
- Family (5)
- Intellectual Property (4)
- Planning (4)
- Charities (3)
- Insurance/reinsurance (3)
- Private Client (3)
- Business Tax (2)
- Competition/EU (2)
- Environment (2)
- Human Rights (2)
- Information Technology (2)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Private Equity (2)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (2)
- Pharma/Biotech (1)
- Privacy and reputation (1)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
The Security Interests (Jersey) Law 2012 provides Jersey with a modern, efficient regime for the creation and enforcement of security interests in intangible property.
Jersey has its own legal system and is a separate jurisdiction from that of England and Wales.
After many years in the pipeline, the draft Financial Services Ombudsman (Jersey) Law 201- has been lodged for debate in the States of Jersey.
The Royal Court has, for the first time, allowed an appeal against the issuing by the Comptroller of a notice to disclose documents under the TIEA regulations.
This table provides a comparison of certain provisions of the Security Interests (Jersey) Law 2012 and the Security Interests (Jersey) Law 1983.
The JFSC has published a guidance note relating to insurance business transfer schemes under the Insurance Business (Jersey) Law 1996.
Limitation periods in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) are imposed by statute, namely the Limitation Ordinance 1961.
Limitation periods in the Cayman Islands are imposed by statute, namely the Limitation Law (1996 Revision).
Much has been made in recent times of the need for transparency in offshore financial centres.
The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority’s recently published statement of guidance on matters of fund governance takes effect on 13 January 2014.
Welcome to the Mourant Ozannes financial services winter update.
This briefing from Mourant Ozannes focuses on the Hastings-Bass principle in Jersey.
Sandra Duerden from Mourant Ozannes has written a chapter focusing on Guernsey for the Getting the Deal Through: Right of Publicity publication.
Jersey Court of Appeal confirms rights of non-trustee fiduciaries to an indemnity out of the trust fund
On appeal from the Royal Court, the Jersey Court of Appeal held that a fiduciary in relation to a trust had an identical right of indemnity in equity out of the trust fund as a trustee.
The interpleader proceedings in Guernsey are dealing with substantial assets claimed to be the proceeds of a fraud alleged against Nikolai Battoo and the BC Capital Group.
Interim injunctive relief is a powerful tool and the ability to freeze a defendant’s assets to prevent dissipation before a matter reaches trial can be an important protective step.
This briefing concerns the latest judgment in the Ablyazov matter following a third application brought by English court appointed receivers, in which the Jersey Royal Court held that it had jurisdiction to appoint the receivers (whose appointment had been recognised by the Jersey Court in an earlier judgment) as managers of a Jersey company.
Note on the decision in Ben Nevis and Anor v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs — Court of Appeal
It is a well-established and almost universal principle that courts of one country will not enforce the revenue laws of another country.
The discretionary power given to the Royal Court to discharge or vary a restraint order in support of ‘external proceedings’ did not permit it to consider allegations of undue delay in those proceedings.
In a helpful judgment, the Jersey Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of the Royal Court in Pirrwitz v AI Airports International Ltd and PI Power International Ltd.