The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
LAWYERS acting for pregnant women sacked from the services are eagerly awaiting the outcome of an employment appeal tribunal hearing.
Hundreds of women with outstanding claims for aggravated damages could be affected by an appeal against an interlocutory judgment on discovery of Ministry of Defence (MoD) documents.
Leeds Industrial Tribunal has ordered the MoD to hand over policy documents on sex discrimination in the forces.
But MoD lawyers have challenged the decision and have indicated that they will seek public interest immunity certificates if the appeal fails.
Victoria Daines, of Norwich-based Steele & Co, says the documents may support claims for higher levels of aggravated damages if they show the ministry deliberately broke European Union law.
The case is being brought on behalf of Pamela Meredith but the appeal decision could affect scores of other claims, says Daines.
A ministry spokeswoman says: "It is ridiculous to assert that the Government would knowingly have operated an unlawful policy of dismissal. No government department would willingly incur liability for thousands of compensation payments even if they were only for a few thousand pounds each."
But Daines says: "I can see no reason why any government department's pregnancy dismissal policy should be a state secret."