Asia-Pacific 100 rank: 4
While many of its peers in Australia have chosen to tie up with an international firm, Minter Ellison has moved forward its agenda to be an Asia-Pacific regional player in its own right.
In 2012, the Australian firm opened an office in Mongolia to capitalise on the country’s emerging resource-based economy. Hong Kong partner Elisabeth Ellis has relocated to Ulaanbaatar to become the office’s resident partner. She is supported by a team of local lawyers, as well as the firm's regional energy and resource team.
Minter Ellison’s chief executive partner John Weber notes the expansion is in line with the firm's strategic focus on the energy and resources industry, and will create natural synergy with its existing Asian offices in Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong.
Elsewhere in Asia, the firm has a nine-partner Greater China team across Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai. Weber says a presence in North Asia is important to the firm, because ‘to build up a credible energy and resources practice in Australia, the firm needs to be close to North Asia clients’.
Having recognised the busy deal flow between Perth and Asia, the firm has also put in efforts on rebuilding its Perth office, where a large team led by 18 partners walked out to set up an office for US firm Squire Sanders in August 2011. The Perth departures were triggered by Minters' move to fully financially integrate the Perth office with its East Coast offices, including Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.
This law firm profile is an edited version of a full write-up that appears in The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150, a comprehensive analysis of the legal market in the region that ranks the top 100 local firms and leading 50 international players by headcount. For more information and to purchase your copy please click here
News from Minter Ellison
Briefings from Minter Ellison
Minter Ellison has created a quarterly update to discuss the tax issues that you may wish to raise with your board during each reporting period, starting with Q3.
In Marshall v Prescott, the NSW Court of Appeal considered the issue of common interest privilege and when insurers and insureds are likely to have a ‘self-same’ interest in proceedings.