Middle man: Paul Bentall, Financial Ombudsman Service
18 November 2008
Related Articles
Doing the knowledge
6 December 2004
The claim drain
29 June 2009
Great expectations
6 March 2006
Selling short
20 April 2011
Overexposure?
9 April 2007
Financial Ombudsman Service general counsel Paul Bentall’s sense of fair play has helped make his organisation respected the world over.
Sitting ;among ;the towering ;financial houses of Canary Wharf, the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) occupies ;a ;unique position in the world of commerce.
Preferring not to be called a regulator, watchdog or trade body, the FOS acts as an independent expert with a government mandate to settle individual complaints between consumers and businesses providing financial services.
In its current form, which was cemented in the Financial Services and Markets Act (2000), the FOS holds a “close constitutional relationship” with official regulators the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). But it is on the ground with the consumers that it is best recognised, receiving more than a million enquires and settling around 100,000 disputes every year.
At the heart of this service is FOS general counsel Paul Bentall, who oversees a team of 10 lawyers, a paralegal, an actuary and an administrator.
Bentall’s team does not get involved in the front-line issues faced by the rest of the FOS workers, but instead provides support to the decision-makers – the adjudicators and ombudsmen. The two-tier system sees the adjudicator seeking a mediated settlement first, which resolves a high percentage of cases. If that does not work an ombudsman will review the case and make
a decision based on a fair and reasonable judgement.
“Our role is to resolve disputes between consumers and financial businesses,” explains Bentall, whose team provides a legal backbone to the day-to-day work of the service.
As the scope of financial developments has widened, so too has the FOS’s jurisdiction. To match this, the number of employees at the service has also grown, from 400 in 2002 to more than 1,000.
This increase in work can be put down to a mixture of public awareness of financial issues (helped by websites such as moneysaving expert.com, ;the ;Daily ;Mail’s Moneymail and the BBC’s Watchdog programme) and from the expansion of the mortgage market over the past few years.
The ;number ;of ;mortgage endowment disputes has jumped from 25,000 a year in 2002 to 100,000 today. Around 40 per cent of the work undertaken by the FOS has to do with pensions and a quarter is on the controversial ‘payment protection insurance’.
“Any in-house lawyer is advising clients and for us the adherence to those principles is the same,” says Bentall. “People who work here are very friendly.
They have different drivers behind what they’re doing compared with those faced by private practice lawyers. We seek to resolve disputes between consumers and businesses, and the people who work in this organisation think, quite rightly, that they’re doing something worthwhile.”
The service receives numerous thank you letters which, as Bentall puts it, “allow us to see the tangible consequences” and add to job satisfaction.
Bentall admits that there is “an element of levelling the playing field”, but stops short of trying to become a consumer champion, preferring instead to remain in a diplomatic position above the fray.
“We can never look at a complaint from a consumer without the consumer having tried the company complaints procedure first,” he says. “We run an independent dispute resolution scheme.”
The FOS lawyers occasionally seek legal opinions and the team has longstanding relationships with 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square and Blackstone Chambers, whom it taps up for litigation advice.
One of the most important jobs for the FOS team is to keep workers informed about legal policy. For this reason it runs a legal surgery for internal staff to give advice, supporting a database of decisions on the FOS intranet and mentoring programmes.
The UK’s FOS is considered a leader in its field. It is the largest ombudsman service in the world and often provides advice to other services. The UK’s courts also take heed, often taking into account the ombudsman service’s approach to judgments.
Bentall sees himself and his team of lawyers as ambassadors for the service, with the aim of developing a good relationship with the Government, businesses, private practice lawyers and consumers.
Not an easy task – and not one that many people would envy in the hard economic months ahead. But for Bentall and his team, it is business
as usual.
Name: Paul Bentall
Organisation: Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS)
Position: General counsel
Industry: Ombudsman service
Reporting to: Corporate director David Thomas
Turnover: £54m
Number of employees: Approximately 1,000
Total legal capability:11
Main advisers: DLA Piper, 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, Blackstone Chambers
Paul Bentall’s CV
Education:
1978: Law degree, Leeds Metropolitan University
1988: Law Society (finals)
Work history:
1980-82: Trainee, Conway Kremer & Co
1982-92: Private practice (various)
1992-2002: Deputy solicitor and head of litigation, Axa Equity and Law Life Assurance Society
2002-present: General counsel, FOS


Readers' comments (2)
Phil Castle (IFA), Director Financial Escape Ltd | 19-Nov-2008 6:34 pm
Why does the FOS believe it has the right to ignore the 15 year long stop for Professional Negligence
My firm has never had a complaint in front of the FOS.
Many advisers have consistently stated to the FOS and others, taking away the legal right to a 15 year longstop defence is stealing through Regulatory dictate what is rightfully ours through statute legislation which the FSA has chosen to ignore.
We are not bankers. We were not bankers, we were/are folk who gave their all to the public and who simply want a defence against "stale" claims, often provoked by claims farmers, but for which the FOS charges a "case fee" regardless of outcome, thus it's a fine for being innocent despite having, as IFAs, the lowest complaints ratio yet unlike other institutions, it is OUR own money at risk, not shareholders or policyholders and so we demand IFAs be allowed to CHOOSE to use the 15 year longstop where relevant, just as you as lawyers are allowed to.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Steve Pett | 24-Nov-2008 4:36 pm
FOS Power
If you are not good enough to become a judge, FOS is the place to start. Even their junior staff have more power than the Law Lords.
That's democracy for you!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment