The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Microsoft has been hit by the largest patent fine in history after a San Diego jury ruled that Windows Media Player infringed Alcatel-Lucent's patents.
Microsoft was ordered to pay Alcatel-Lucent $1.52bn (£770m) for using MP3 technology without a licence, almost triple the $612m (£311.78m) that BlackBerry maker RIM paid to NTP in March 2007.
The jury awarded damages of $769m (£391.76m) for each of the two patents that were found to be infringed.
Kirkland & Ellis litigation star John Desmarais acted for Alcatel-Lucent against Fish & Richardson's John Gartman.
The decision, which Microsoft will appeal, will worry other companies that use MP3 technology.
Microsoft deputy general counsel Tom Burt said in a statement: "We think this verdict is completely unsupported by the law or the facts.
"We are concerned that this decision opens the door for Alcatel-Lucent to pursue action against hundreds of other companies who purchased the rights to use MP3 technology from Fraunhofer, the industry-recognised rightful licensor."
Microsoft argued that it had already paid $16m (£8.15m) to license the technology from Fraunhofer, which developed the MP3 technology with Bell Labs. Last year Alcatel acquired Lucent Technologies, which owns Bell Labs.
Microsoft has hit back with several patent counter-claims pending in the International Trade Commission.