Categories:Scotland

McGrigors to cut 40 jobs in UK-wide redundancy round

  • Print
  • Comments (81)

Readers' comments (81)

  • @ 9:36 "its worth noting that the firms seem to have done everything they could over a 2 year period to avoid having to make this kind of step - pay freezes, unpaid leave etc."
    "etc" - it covers many things but not, in this case, profits. Whilst profits may be down at most firms lets not forget that partners are still trousering well above average income so more could have been done (if they'd really wanted to).
    Look at Dragon's Den (for example), entreprenuers pay themselves peanuts to get businesses running through difficult patches yet partners nevertheless strip out substantial drawings even if it is supported by bank debt.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Scottish law firm", "Edingburgh headquartered", these types of terms are being bandied about in the legal press when reporting on the redundancies. Good to see that the recent re-brand the firm under went has been such a success. Be good to know how much that ridiculous project cost and what benefit its actually had other than irritating email recipients when they get a big coloured 'M's clogging up their inboxes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Dell- correct. Despite the staff taking a period of unpaid leave and generally taking the pain of the recession, the partners were still taking home 250-300k or thereabouts. Obviously D&W partners taking home 300k plus this year was the straw that broke the camels back. Got to keep up with the Joneses!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • McGrigors has done itself no favours with its previous policy of offering jobs to all qualifying trainees. There are some shockingly bad NQ-4 years qualified people working there - on occasion I have wondered how some of them even got through university. Lets hope for the sake of all the capable fee earners that it is the useless few who are made redundant.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting they are coming out and calling it a redundancy programme this time. Plenty of people have mysteriously disappeared over the last year or 2 for various reasons (absolutely not redundancy, no, never that) and yes that includes a few partners. But overdrafts are overdrafts and their accounts show it's a biggie. V arrogant organisation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They merged with L'Estraneg and Brett but instead of doing what any sensible firm would do and moving everyone to one of the, many, sizeable offices sitting empty in Belfast they kept the two. Can't imagine the upkeep in either is cheap given their locations.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The place is in disarray. Big overheads, big overdraft and big egos. I'm still working there but just started looking elsewhere. We picked up a few fat cats in Manchester and Belfast in the last 12 months through "strategic opportunities" but integration hasn't been that smooth with everyone jostling for positions and many partners on power trips....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A lot of complaining about the partners.
    Solicitors are cash machines for their firms. They always have been and always will be.
    The problem with solicitors is that they think if they work really hard and put in lots of extra hours for free then they will be recognised and rewarded.
    In reality they are just mugs playing the game.
    If the work is not there, then there is no need for you. Simple. Firms owe you nothing except the salary they agree to pay.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a former employee at McGrigors I am sad to see this news. Not once in my 5+ years there did I ever see the big egos or arrogance that some people are posting about - quite the opposite. Perhaps in the last few years things have changed but there are still a lot of good people there and people I consider my friends.
    Best of luck to all at McGrigors

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I hope the "Dickinson Dees model" (ditch everyone except under-performing partners) isn't being followed. The A&O model (share the pain) seems to be much more successful.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (81)